MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s41415-023-6267-x

Медицинская библиотека · British dental journal · 2023

Evaluation of a custom-made mandibular repositioning device for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.

Flouris Lampros, Millar Brian

МетаанализСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common, chronic condition that affects breathing during sleep. The gold standard for treatment is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) which is often not well-tolerated. Mandibular repositioning appliances (MRDs) are an alternative that dentists may be requested to provide.The purpose of this audit is to evaluate the effectiveness of an MRD in improving the Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI) and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). A total of 52 patients diagnosed with OSA in an NHS hospital respiratory clinic were fitted with an MRD. Analysis of the digitally recorded oximeter signals was recorded among other treatment outcomes before and 6-8 weeks after the fit of the appliance.The meta-analysis of the audit data showed supportive evidence for MRD treatment in OSA patients. There was a statistically significant reduction in ODI and ESS. The audit population consisted of 138 patients (91 men, 47 women; mean age: 49.49 ± 11.93 years). The ODI outcomes improved significantly, from 10.68 to 6.58 (p <0.02). The ESS improved significantly from 9.46 to 6.02 (p <0.01).This audit demonstrates that MRDs are effective and should be considered as an alternative to CPAP in some specific OSA phenotypes.

Для цитирования: Flouris Lampros, Millar Brian. Evaluation of a custom-made mandibular repositioning device for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.. British dental journal. 2023. DOI: 10.1038/s41415-023-6267-x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.