MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001267

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open respiratory research · 2022

Transitioning from hospital to home with non-invasive ventilation: who benefits? Results of a cohort study.

Fox Benjamin Daniel, Bondarenco Marina, Shpirer Isaac, Natif Noam, Perl Sivan

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is effective in a variety of acute respiratory illnesses in hospitalised patients. Home NIV is effective for stable patients with hypercapnia due to neuromuscular or chronic pulmonary disease. However, there are little data to guide which patients may benefit from NIV immediately following hospitalisation with hypercapnia.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate outcomes of patients with daytime hypercapnia at the end of an acute hospital admission.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Entry into the cohort was by querying the hospital electronic medical system for consultations regarding NIV after discharge. Cases received NIV and controls did not. We extracted data on demographics, ICD-9 diagnoses and medications coded at admission, blood gas measurements and dates of discharge, first readmission and death.

INTERVENTION: None.

MAIN MEASUREMENT: Time from hospital discharge to mortality or readmission.

KEY

RESULTS

We identified 585 cases and 53 controls who survived to discharge at the index admission. Cases and controls were broadly similar in age and Charlson Comorbidity Index. In the whole cohort, cases treated with home NIV were at increased risk of death compared with controls (HR 1.88 95% CI 1.17 to 3.03). In multivariate Cox regression for all-cause mortality, poor prognostic factors were increasing age (HR 1.03 per year, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.04), cardiac failure (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.67) and failure to attend NIV follow-up (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.33 to 4.10). In contrast, chronic respiratory disease was associated with improved prognosis (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.97) as was sleep apnoea (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.83). Cases did not have different time-to-readmission compared with controls (HR 1.42 95% CI 0.99 to 2.02).

CONCLUSION

Transitioning to home NIV after a hypercapnic hospitalisation may be useful in younger, co-operative patients with chronic respiratory disease. For older patients or those with cardiac failure, home NIV may not be beneficial and may potentially be harmful.

Для цитирования: Fox Benjamin Daniel, Bondarenco Marina, Shpirer Isaac, Natif Noam, Perl Sivan. Transitioning from hospital to home with non-invasive ventilation: who benefits? Results of a cohort study.. BMJ open respiratory research. 2022. DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001267.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.