MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1109/icorr55369.2022.9896510

Медицинская библиотека · IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings] · 2022

Mirror-Based Robotic Therapy for Ankle Recovery with a Serious Game: A Case Study with a Neurological Patient.

Pino Angie, Gomez-Vargas Daniel, Garzon Andrea, Roberti Flavio, Carelli Ricardo, Munera Marcela, Cifuentes Carlos A

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Neuromuscular disorders, such as foot drop, severely affect the locomotor function and walking independence after a brain injury event. Mirror-based robotic therapy (MRT) has been a promising rehabilitation strategy favouring upper limb muscle strength and motor control in the last years. However, there are still no studies validating this technique in lower limb experimental protocols. This paper presents an innovative visual and motor feedback strategy based on serious games and MRT modalities. Thus, a preliminary system validation with a healthy participant is performed. Moreover, the strategy's potential effects were investigated in a neurologic patient's short rehabilitation program. After six sessions, the results of the method favoured active ankle plantarflexion range of motion and muscle activation. Although the patient had a positive adaptation at the end of the game, it is necessary to improve the proposed strategy to enhance the robotic experience in the long term.

Для цитирования: Pino Angie, Gomez-Vargas Daniel, Garzon Andrea, Roberti Flavio, Carelli Ricardo, Munera Marcela, Cifuentes Carlos A. Mirror-Based Robotic Therapy for Ankle Recovery with a Serious Game: A Case Study with a Neurological Patient.. IEEE ... International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics : [proceedings]. 2022. DOI: 10.1109/icorr55369.2022.9896510.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.