Modified submandibular mandibulotomy approach versus lip-splitting approach in tongue cancer surgery: a retrospective paired-cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

The surgical approach for resection and reconstruction of tongue cancer (TSCC) with or without the lip-splitting incision is controversial. This study introduced a modified approach without lip-splitting and the clinical results were assessed.

METHODS

Sixty-eight TSCC patients underwent surgery using the modified submandibular mandibulotomy (MSMM) approach without lip-splitting, and another matched 68 patients using lip-splitting mandibulotomy (LSM) approach were enrolled in this study. The clinical results including intraoperative relevance and surgical morbidities, survival status, facial appearance and scar scores, function of lower lip, and quality of life (QOL) were evaluated.

RESULTS

The primary tumors were en bloc resected through the MSMM approach with excellent tumor exposure and R0 resection margins as LSM approach. The survival status and complications were similar in both groups. The function of lower lip was better in patients of MSMM group at 1 month after surgery. The MSMM approach was associated with significantly better facial appearance and recreation compared to LSM approach by scar scores and QOL assessment.

CONCLUSION

The MSMM approach without lip-splitting achieves similar tumor control, better aesthetic results, and QOL compared to LSM approach. It is a safe and effective surgical approach for patients with TSCC.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The MSMM approach without lip-splitting is oncological safety in tongue cancer surgery and is scrutinized as one part of the treatment concept for better aesthetic results.