MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0293837

Медицинская библиотека · PloS one · 2023

Affective work rumination as a mediator of the reciprocal relationships between job demands and exhaustion.

Geisler Martin, Buratti Sandra, Allwood Carl Martin

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

High levels of job demands are considered as the main predictor for teachers' exhaustion, but longitudinal studies of the causal effects are few. Recently it has been suggested that research should further explore possible reciprocal relationships between stressors and strain and investigate if work rumination contributes to explain these relationships. In a sample of teachers (n = 1067) using a three-wave design, we hypothesized positive causal effects of job demands (work pace and role conflict) on affective work rumination, and of affective work rumination on exhaustion. We also hypothesized a positive reversed causal effect of exhaustion on affective work rumination, and of affective work rumination on job demands. Furthermore, affective work rumination was expected to mediate the positive causal and reversed causal effects between job demands and exhaustion. The results partly confirmed the expected causal and reversed causal effects. However, affective work rumination was only found to mediate the reversed causal effect of exhaustion and role conflict. Furthermore, a reciprocal relationship was only found between role conflict and exhaustion. The empirical, theoretical, and practical implications of the study are discussed.

Для цитирования: Geisler Martin, Buratti Sandra, Allwood Carl Martin. Affective work rumination as a mediator of the reciprocal relationships between job demands and exhaustion.. PloS one. 2023. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293837.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.