MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1162/089892999563247

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 1999

Blindsight in subjects with homonymous visual field defects.

Scharli H, Harman A M, Hogben J H

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Brain damage in the visual system can lead to apparently blind visual areas. However, more elaborate testing indicates that some visual ability may still exist for specific stimuli in the otherwise blind regions. This phenomenon is called 'blindsight' if subjects report no conscious awareness of visual stimuli but when forced to guess, nevertheless perform better than chance. It has mainly been suggested that secondary visual pathways are responsible for this phenomenon. However, no published study has clearly shown the neural mechanism responsible for blindsight. Furthermore, experimental artifacts may have been responsible for the appearance of the phenomenon in some subjects. In the present study, the visual fields of nine subjects were mapped and residual visual performance was examined in many areas using three different experimental procedures. Artifacts such as stray light or eye movements were well controlled. In addition, confidence ratings were required after each trial in the forced-choice tests. The results show that only one subject with a lesion in the optic radiation had blindsight in two discrete areas of the affected visual field. Spared optic radiation fibers of the main (primary) geniculo-striate visual pathway were most likely to account for this finding.

Для цитирования: Scharli H, Harman A M, Hogben J H. Blindsight in subjects with homonymous visual field defects.. Journal of cognitive neuroscience. 1999. DOI: 10.1162/089892999563247.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.