Motion automated perimetry identifies early glaucomatous field defects.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if motion automated perimetry can identify early glaucomatous visual field defects in patients with suspected glaucoma (by disc), those with ocular hypertension, and those with primary open-angle glaucoma.

METHODS

Motion automated perimetry, a foveally centered motion test, and standard visual field tests were conducted on one randomly selected eye of normal patients (n = 38), patients with suspected glaucoma (by disc) (n = 28), patients with ocular hypertension (n = 18), and patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (n = 21). Subjects' performance on both motion tests were compared with their performance on standard perimetry.

RESULTS

Perimetric motion thresholds significantly distinguished the groups (P< or =.001), while the foveally centered motion test was unable to separate them (P< or =.32). Of the total patients, 90.5% of those with glaucoma, 39.3% of those with suspected glaucoma, 27.8% of those with ocular hypertension, and 5.3% of the normal subjects had abnormal results on motion automated perimetry testing. Perimetric motion thresholds were significantly correlated with standard visual field thresholds (P< or =.001).

CONCLUSION

Motion automated perimetry identifies visual field defects in patients who already show standard visual field loss as well as in a moderate percentage of those with suspected glaucoma and ocular hypertension, indicating that the testing of discrete locations might be necessary for increased diagnostic utility.