MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ico.0b013e31805fc37b

Медицинская библиотека · Cornea · 2007

Aspergillus-induced malignant glaucoma.

Jain Vandana, Maiti Aniruddha, Shome Debraj, Borse Nishikant, Natarajan Sundaram

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To report a case of Aspergillus flavus-induced keratomycotic malignant glaucoma.

METHODS

A 48-year-old woman presented with a severe corneal ulcer. She had received topical steroids for 10 days before presentation.

RESULTS

Microbiological studies revealed A. flavus as the offending pathogen. Nonresponsive high intraocular pressure with associated shallow anterior chamber was present. With a diagnosis of keratomycotic malignant glaucoma, the patient underwent therapeutic keratoplasty with cataract extraction with posterior chamber wash. However, there was a recurrence of malignant glaucoma in the postoperative period. Patient underwent limited pars plana vitrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Keratomycotic malignant glaucoma is a rare complication of severe fungal ulcer. We believe that the use of topical steroids in this case probably led to increased fungal penetration, with the formation of a lens-iris fungal mass and subsequent malignant glaucoma. Nonresponse to medical therapy warrants urgent surgical intervention. To the best of our knowledge, Aspergillus-induced keratomycotic glaucoma has never been reported previously. This report also highlights that therapeutic keratoplasty with cataract extraction alone may not be sufficient for management of such cases, and a limited pars plana vitrectomy may be needed.

Для цитирования: Jain Vandana, Maiti Aniruddha, Shome Debraj, Borse Nishikant, Natarajan Sundaram. Aspergillus-induced malignant glaucoma.. Cornea. 2007. DOI: 10.1097/ico.0b013e31805fc37b.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.