MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1038/s41394-020-00360-8

Медицинская библиотека · Spinal cord series and cases · 2020

Football (soccer)-related spinal cord injury-reported cases from 1976 to 2020.

Poudel Manoj K, Sherman Andrew L

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

STUDY

DESIGN

An analysis of reported cases.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the existing data on soccer (international football)-related spinal cord injury (SCI).

SETTING

Cases of soccer (international football)-related SCI that were reported globally.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and online news publication databases were searched.

RESULTS

Fourteen cases of football-related SCI that occurred between 1976 and 2020 were found. Average age at the time of injury was 19 and 86% of individuals were males. Eight of 14 individuals had vertebral fracture/dislocation, whereas two individuals had concomitant traumatic brain injury. Neurologically, 54% had tetraplegia, 39% had paraplegia, and 8% each suffered from hemiplegia and sensory deficit. Two cases could regain ability to walk with orthosis and four had full mobility with "Return to Play" (RTP). The mortality was 14%.

CONCLUSIONS

Younger males were most commonly affected. The most common etiology, vertebral level of injury, and neurological manifestation was fall, cervical spine, and tetraplegia respectively. More than 50% of the individuals with football-related SCI were able to walk or RTP after rehabilitation. Further studies are required to establish universal RTP criteria and formulate preventive measures.

Для цитирования: Poudel Manoj K, Sherman Andrew L. Football (soccer)-related spinal cord injury-reported cases from 1976 to 2020.. Spinal cord series and cases. 2020. DOI: 10.1038/s41394-020-00360-8.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.