MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.08.003

Медицинская библиотека · Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology · 2011

Visual inspection methods for cervical cancer prevention.

Sankaranarayanan Rengaswamy, Nessa Ashrafun, Esmy Pulikattil Okkuru, Dangou Jean-Marie

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The need for simple, cost-effective screening approaches for cervical cancer prevention in low-resource countries has led to the evaluation of visual screening with 3-5% acetic acid. The low reproducibility and wide variation in accuracy reflect the subjective nature of the test. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 80%, 92%, 10% and 99%, respectively, for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse lesions. Realistic sensitivity of a quality- assured single visual inspection with acetic acid is around 50%. A single round of visual inspection with acetic acid screening has been associated with a 25-35% reduction in cervical cancer incidence and the frequency of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse lesions in randomised-controlled trials. Despite all its limitations, implementing visual inspection with acetic acid screening in low-resource countries may provide a pragmatic approach to building up human resources and infrastructure that may facilitate the highly anticipated low-cost, rapid human papilloma virus testing in the near future.

Для цитирования: Sankaranarayanan Rengaswamy, Nessa Ashrafun, Esmy Pulikattil Okkuru, Dangou Jean-Marie. Visual inspection methods for cervical cancer prevention.. Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.08.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.