Nuclear medicine communications · 2022
[18F]FDG PET/MRI in the follow-up of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zucchetta Pietro, Lacognata Carmelo, Girardi Francesca, Spimpolo Alessandro, Crimì Filippo, Cabrelle Giulio, Zanon Chiara, Boccagni Patrizia, Evangelista Laura, Cecchin Diego, Cillo Umberto
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence regarding the application of [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/MRI in patients with a suspected clinical recurrence, who underwent liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therefore, we compared the accuracy of PET/MR and standard-of-care (SOC) imaging in these patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 26 patients, whose liver were transplanted for HCC and were suspected of disease relapse based on biochemical analysis or SOC follow-up imaging, and carried out PET/MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging sequences on them. All patients underwent SOC imaging within the 2 months prior to the PET/MRI examination and had follow-up data for at least 12 months after. Reference standards were histopathology, clinical and imaging follow-up data.
RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for PET/MRI were 100, 94, 91, 100 and 96%, whereas for SOC imaging were 80, 69, 61, 85 and 73%. The accuracy of PET/MRI was higher with respect to SOC imaging, although not significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: PET/MRI is useful for oncological surveillance of patients who have undergone liver transplantation for HCC, particularly in cases of allergy to contrast media, renal failure or persistently elevated alpha-fetoprotein levels, and with no identification of metastatic/relapsing foci at standard-of-care imaging.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 26 patients, whose liver were transplanted for HCC and were suspected of disease relapse based on biochemical analysis or SOC follow-up imaging, and carried out PET/MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging sequences on them. All patients underwent SOC imaging within the 2 months prior to the PET/MRI examination and had follow-up data for at least 12 months after. Reference standards were histopathology, clinical and imaging follow-up data.
RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for PET/MRI were 100, 94, 91, 100 and 96%, whereas for SOC imaging were 80, 69, 61, 85 and 73%. The accuracy of PET/MRI was higher with respect to SOC imaging, although not significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: PET/MRI is useful for oncological surveillance of patients who have undergone liver transplantation for HCC, particularly in cases of allergy to contrast media, renal failure or persistently elevated alpha-fetoprotein levels, and with no identification of metastatic/relapsing foci at standard-of-care imaging.