MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1161/circgen.124.004937

Медицинская библиотека · Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2025

Importance of Clinical, Laboratory, and Genetic Risk Factors for Incident CAD.

Bhattacharya Romit, Marnell Christopher S, Cho So Mi Jemma, Patel Aniruddh P, Ruan Yunfeng, Koyama Satoshi, Jowell Amanda R, Trinder Mark, Haidermota Sara, Lannery Kim, Honigberg Michael C, Zekevat Seyedeh M, Surakka Ida, Peloso Gina M, Natarajan Pradeep

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Prior work suggests modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (CRFs) account for 80% to 90% of the risk for incident myocardial infarction. The contributions of genetic and other novel CRFs have not been simultaneously assessed in contemporary data sets.

METHODS

In the United Kingdom Biobank, CRFs were identified and Cox proportional hazards models with traditional CRFs (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, waist-to-hip ratio, diet, exercise, alcohol, and socioeconomic deprivation) and contemporary/genetic CRFs (Lp(a) [lipoprotein(a)], hsCRP [high-sensitivity C-reactive protein], familial hypercholesterolemia variants, and polygenic risk score for coronary artery disease) were constructed for coronary artery disease. Coronary artery disease was defined as a first-time myocardial infarction diagnosis or coronary revascularization. R2 was calculated for each model, and the percent contribution of each individual CRF was calculated by the R2 percent decrease after its removal.

RESULTS

Among 299 707 individuals, the mean (SD) age was 56.2 (8.1) years, and 166 533 (55.6%) were women. Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 11.0 (9.6-12.5) years, 17 409 (5.8%) of participants developed myocardial infarction. R2 increased from the base model (R2, 0.021 [0.020-0.022]), to the clinical model (R2, 0.045 [0.043-0.046]), to the contemporary/genetic model (R2, 0.053 [0.052-0.055]). The most powerful individual CRFs were hypertension (R2 loss, 15.2% [14.5-17.1]) and polygenic risk score for coronary artery disease (R2 loss, 12.4% [10.8-13.3]), followed by dyslipidemia (R2 loss, 3.4% [2.6-3.5]), diabetes (R2 loss, 2.2% [1.5-2.0]), hsCRP (R2 loss, 1.8% [1.5-2.0]), and Lp(a) (R2 loss, 1.5% [1.2-1.8]).

CONCLUSIONS

Novel CRFs like polygenic risk score for coronary artery disease, hsCRP, and Lp(a) have similar importance, comparable to traditional CRFs such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes, for incident myocardial infarction, highlighting important identifiable residual risk factors.

Для цитирования: Bhattacharya Romit, Marnell Christopher S, Cho So Mi Jemma, Patel Aniruddh P, Ruan Yunfeng, Koyama Satoshi, Jowell Amanda R, Trinder Mark, Haidermota Sara, Lannery Kim, Honigberg Michael C, Zekevat Seyedeh M, Surakka Ida, Peloso Gina M, Natarajan Pradeep. Importance of Clinical, Laboratory, and Genetic Risk Factors for Incident CAD.. Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1161/circgen.124.004937.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.