DOI 10.1097/mnm.0b013e3283299992
Thyroid remnant ablation in patients with papillary cancer: a comparison of low, moderate, and high activities of radioiodine.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
The consensus about optimal activities of I-131 for thyroid remnant ablation has not yet been achieved. The aim of this study was to compare ablation rates obtained with different I-131 activities.
PATIENTS AND
METHODS
The study included 466 patients divided into four groups according to I-131 activities given after total thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid cancer: group A [168 patients who received 888 MBq (24 mCi)], group B [125 patients who received 1480 MBq (40 mCi)], group C [65 patients who received 1850 MBq (50 mCi)], and group D [108 patients who received 4440 MBq (120 mCi)]. Ablation outcome was assessed by whole-body scan in hypothyroid state 6-9 months after ablation and finally 18-21 months after the treatment.
RESULTS
The rate of successful ablation was similar in the group of patients who received 24 and 40 mCi (75 and 71.2%, respectively). The higher rate of ablation was achieved in the groups treated with 50 and 120 mCi of radioiodine (87.69 and 90.74%, respectively). The ablation rates at the first follow-up examinations (59.5, 67.2, 73.9, 80.6%) were lower than at second control study (75.0, 71.2, 87.7, 90.7%) in all groups. Time required for thyroid remnant ablation seems to be >or=18 months.
CONCLUSION
Our study indicates that activity of 50 mCi seems to be optimal to achieve a successful ablation rate (approximately 90%). Low I-131 activities are acceptable for lower risk patients because of satisfactory ablation rate (>70%), lower expense, and minimal radiation burden to patients as well as lower radiation exposure to clinical staff. The ablative use of high activities seems neither justified nor optimized.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.