Gene · 2013
DCC (deleted in colorectal carcinoma) gene variants confer increased susceptibility to gallbladder cancer (Ref. No.: Gene-D-12-01446).
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rai Rajani, Sharma Kiran L, Tiwari Swati, Misra Sanjeev, Kumar Ashok, Mittal Balraj
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM: GBC is a lethal and multifaceted disease. Deleted in colorectal carcinoma (DCC) is a well known tumor suppressor gene. Recently a small genome-wide association study (GWAS) identified DCC to be significantly associated with gallbladder cancer (GBC) susceptibility in a Japanese population sample. However, the study sample size was small and lacked independent replication. Therefore, the present study was carried out to replicate the association of two GWAS identified DCC SNPs (A>Grs4078288, C>Trs7504990) and two other SNPs (C>Grs2229080 and A>Grs714) previously associated with various cancers.
METHODOLOGY: The study was accomplished in 406 GBC cases and 260 healthy control samples from North India. Genotyping was carried out by PCR-RFLP and Taqman genotyping assays. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS ver16 and functional prediction of these variants was carried out using Bioinformatics tools (FAST-SNP, F-SNP).
RESULT: We did not observe association with GWAS-identified SNPs of DCC but other SNPs showed significant association. In addition, a DCC haplotype Grs2229080-Ars4078288-Crs7504990-Ars714 conferred high risk of GBC in India. The haplotype associated risk was independent of gallstone, sex or tobacco usages which are well-known modifiers of GBC risk. Further analysis suggested DCC A>Grs714 as a major risk conferring SNP in the Indian population.
CONCLUSION: This study re-affirms the role of plausible tumor suppressor DCC variants, in gallbladder carcinogenesis and the risk haplotype may be explored as a useful marker for GBC susceptibility.
METHODOLOGY: The study was accomplished in 406 GBC cases and 260 healthy control samples from North India. Genotyping was carried out by PCR-RFLP and Taqman genotyping assays. Statistical analysis was performed by using SPSS ver16 and functional prediction of these variants was carried out using Bioinformatics tools (FAST-SNP, F-SNP).
RESULT: We did not observe association with GWAS-identified SNPs of DCC but other SNPs showed significant association. In addition, a DCC haplotype Grs2229080-Ars4078288-Crs7504990-Ars714 conferred high risk of GBC in India. The haplotype associated risk was independent of gallstone, sex or tobacco usages which are well-known modifiers of GBC risk. Further analysis suggested DCC A>Grs714 as a major risk conferring SNP in the Indian population.
CONCLUSION: This study re-affirms the role of plausible tumor suppressor DCC variants, in gallbladder carcinogenesis and the risk haplotype may be explored as a useful marker for GBC susceptibility.