MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/sle.0b013e31823bada9

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques · 2011

Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and effective.

Jakobsen Henrik Loft, Vilmann Peter, Rosenberg Jacob

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Management strategy for common bile duct (CBD) stones is controversial with several treatment options if stones in the CBD are recognized intraoperatively. The aim of this study was to report our experience with same-session combined endoscopic-laparoscopic treatment of gallbladder and CBD stones. We retrospectively evaluated 31 patients with cholecystolithiasis and CBD stones undergoing same-session combined endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy and endoscopic stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Same-session ERCP and sphincterotomy were performed in all patients, and stone extraction was successfully performed in 29 patients (93%) with 2 failures (7%) due to impacted stones. In 8 patients (26%), the laparoscopic procedure was converted to open cholecystectomy because of dense adhesions or unclear anatomy. Two patients (7%) developed mild pancreatitis postoperatively and no other morbidity or mortality. In conclusion, same-session ERCP with stone extraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy seems to be a safe and effective treatment strategy for CBD stones.

Для цитирования: Jakobsen Henrik Loft, Vilmann Peter, Rosenberg Jacob. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and effective.. Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques. 2011. DOI: 10.1097/sle.0b013e31823bada9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.