MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00464-010-1336-z

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical endoscopy · 2010

Long-term outcome and survival with laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.

Jiang Xiaohua, Hiki Naoki, Nunobe Souya, Fukunaga Tetsu, Kumagai Koshi, Nohara Kyoko, Katayama Hiroshi, Ohyama Shigekazu, Sano Takeshi, Yamaguchi Toshiharu

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopically assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (LAPPG) is introduced as a function-preserving operation with minimal invasion for early gastric cancer (EGC). This study aimed to investigate the long-term outcome and survival with LAPPG.

METHODS

From January 2005 to July 2008, 188 patients with EGC underwent LAPPG. The surgical and long-term outcomes and survival were assessed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The accuracy of the preoperative EGC diagnosis was 92.6%. The median follow-up period was 38 months (range, 2-63 months). Two patients experienced gallstones, and three patients experienced a second primary EGC. One patient with T3N0 gastric cancer died of peritoneal metastasis, and four patients died of other causes. The overall 3-year survival rate was 97.8%, and the disease-specific 3-year survival rate was 99.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

The LAPPG procedure is safe in terms of satisfactory long-term outcome and survival for patients with EGC in the middle third of the stomach.

Для цитирования: Jiang Xiaohua, Hiki Naoki, Nunobe Souya, Fukunaga Tetsu, Kumagai Koshi, Nohara Kyoko, Katayama Hiroshi, Ohyama Shigekazu, Sano Takeshi, Yamaguchi Toshiharu. Long-term outcome and survival with laparoscopy-assisted pylorus-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.. Surgical endoscopy. 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1336-z.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.