American journal of otolaryngology · 2023
Comparing accuracy of machine learning approaches to identifying parathyroid adenomas: Lessons and new directions.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Greene Cynthia, Fujima Noriyuki, Sakai Osamu, Andreu-Arasa V Carlota
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation is to understand the accuracy of machine learning techniques to detect biopsy-proven adenomas from similar appearing lymph nodes and factors that influence accuracy by comparing support vector machine (SVM) and bidirectional Long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) analyses. This will provide greater insight into how these tools could integrate multidimensional data and aid the detection of parathyroid adenomas consistently and accurately.
METHODS: Ninety-nine patients were identified; 93 4D-CTs of patients with pathology-proven parathyroid adenomas were reviewed; 94 parathyroid adenomas and 112 lymph nodes were analyzed. A 2D slice through the lesions in each phase was used to perform sequence classification with ResNet50 as the pre-trained network to construct the Bi-LSTM model, and the mean enhancement curves were used to form an SVM model. The model characteristics and accuracy were calculated for the training and validation data sets.
RESULTS: On the training data, the area under the curve (AUC) of the Bi-LSTM was 0.99, while the SVM was 0.95 and statistically significant on the DeLong test. The overall accuracy of the Bi-LSTM on the validation data set was 92 %, while the SVM was 88 %. The accuracy for parathyroid adenomas specifically was 93 % for the Bi-LSTM and 83 % for the SVM model.
CONCLUSION: Enhancement characteristics are a distinguishing feature that accurately identifies parathyroid adenomas alone. The Bi-LSTM performs statistically better in identifying parathyroid adenomas than the SVM analysis when using both morphologic and enhancement information to distinguish between parathyroid adenomas and lymph nodes.
SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Bi-LSTM more accurately identifies parathyroid adenomas than the SVM analysis, which uses both morphologic and enhancement information to distinguish between parathyroid adenomas and lymph nodes, performs statistically better.
METHODS: Ninety-nine patients were identified; 93 4D-CTs of patients with pathology-proven parathyroid adenomas were reviewed; 94 parathyroid adenomas and 112 lymph nodes were analyzed. A 2D slice through the lesions in each phase was used to perform sequence classification with ResNet50 as the pre-trained network to construct the Bi-LSTM model, and the mean enhancement curves were used to form an SVM model. The model characteristics and accuracy were calculated for the training and validation data sets.
RESULTS: On the training data, the area under the curve (AUC) of the Bi-LSTM was 0.99, while the SVM was 0.95 and statistically significant on the DeLong test. The overall accuracy of the Bi-LSTM on the validation data set was 92 %, while the SVM was 88 %. The accuracy for parathyroid adenomas specifically was 93 % for the Bi-LSTM and 83 % for the SVM model.
CONCLUSION: Enhancement characteristics are a distinguishing feature that accurately identifies parathyroid adenomas alone. The Bi-LSTM performs statistically better in identifying parathyroid adenomas than the SVM analysis when using both morphologic and enhancement information to distinguish between parathyroid adenomas and lymph nodes.
SUMMARY STATEMENT: The Bi-LSTM more accurately identifies parathyroid adenomas than the SVM analysis, which uses both morphologic and enhancement information to distinguish between parathyroid adenomas and lymph nodes, performs statistically better.