Microbial Genomic Consortia in Prostate Cancer: Mechanistic Signaling, the Gut-Prostate Axis, and Translational Perspectives.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pérez-Campos Mayoral Eduardo, Pérez-Campos Mayoral Laura, Hernández-Huerta María Teresa, Cabrera-Fuentes Hector Alejandro, Jarquín-González Efrén Emmanuel, Martínez-Ruiz Héctor, Martínez-Cruz Margarito, Romero-Diaz Carlos, Avendaño-Villegas Miriam Emily, Mayoral-Andrade Gabriel, Lastre-Domínguez Carlos Mauricio, Zenteno Edgar, Pina-Canseco María Del Socorro, Olivera González Primitivo Ismael, Martínez-Martínez Lucia, Santiago-Luna Bernardo Rodrigo, Vázquez-Pérez Javier, Cruz-Pérez Andrea Paola, Palmero-Alcántara Diana, Santiago-Ramírez Tania Sinaí, Briones-Guerash Erico, Ramírez-Davila Abelardo Augusto, Ruiz-Rosado Juan de Dios, Pérez-Campos Eduardo
Аннотация
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) arises from complex interactions among host genetics, androgen signaling, and microbial communities. Emerging genomic evidence supports the presence of microbial consortia within prostate tissue, suggesting that microbial genes, metabolites, and host-microbe interactions may contribute to chronic inflammation, oncogenic signaling, and therapeutic resistance. Methods: We conducted a narrative review using targeted searches of PubMed and Google Scholar for studies published between 2020 and 2025, complemented by selected mechanistic reports published in March 2026. Human studies and experimental research providing mechanistic insights into prostate models were prioritized. Due to the heterogeneous methodologies, evidence was synthesized qualitatively, with an emphasis on genomic and signaling perspectives. Results: Low-biomass microbial DNA is consistently detected in prostate tissue. Proteomic analyses of Corpora amylacea suggest a "fossil record" of past infections through sequestered microbial DNA and antimicrobial proteins, potentially priming tissue for long-term carcinogenic processes, although contamination remains a key limitation. Recurrent bacterial and viral signals, including Cutibacterium acnes, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, human papillomavirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and cytomegalovirus, appear to converge on a restricted set of tumor-relevant pathways, including TLR-NF-κB, MAPK, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, cGAS-STING, and p53/pRb disruption. These interactions may promote cytokine production, oxidative stress, DNA damage, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, extracellular matrix remodeling, immune evasion, and resistance to therapy. The gut-prostate axis further links intestinal dysbiosis and microbial metabolites with systemic IGF-1 signaling and castration resistance. Conclusions: Microbial genomic consortia in the prostate and gut may shape inflammatory, metabolic, and immune networks that influence PCa initiation and progression. However, most available data remain correlative and are limited by low-biomass sampling, contamination risk, and heterogeneous study designs. Future research should prioritize rigorous contamination control, longitudinal and prostate-specific mechanistic studies, and integrated multi-omic approaches to clarify causality and identify actionable microbial targets for prevention, diagnosis, and therapy.