AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2010
Thermoablative treatments for malignant liver lesions: 10-year experience of MRI appearances of treatment response.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kierans Andrea S, Elazzazi Mohamed, Braga Larissa, Leonardou Polytimi, Gerber David A, Burke Charles, Qureshi Waqas, Kanematsu Masayuki, Semelka Richard C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to describe our 10-year experience using MRI to evaluate response to local thermoablative interventions in the treatment of malignant liver lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted from 1998 to 2008. MRI studies were performed at 1.5 and 3 T and were acquired < 4, 4-9, and > 9 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation, and microwave ablation. MR features were evaluated on the basis of signal intensity on unenhanced T1-weighted images and the presence of ill-defined perilesional enhancement, well-defined lesional enhancement, or washout on contrast-enhanced images. Imaging features were evaluated with all interventional modalities together and separately.
RESULTS: The study population was composed of 135 men and 36 women (203 ablated lesions) with a mean age of 65 years (range, 39-78 years). When the data for all treatment methods were combined, well-defined lesional enhancement and washout were significant findings among the resolved and unresolved outcome groups regardless of follow-up time category. After RFA, ablated areas had a tendency to show high signal intensity on T1 images, whereas low signal was seen after cryoablation and a hyperintense rim was seen after microwave ablation. Washout was only depicted 9 months after cryoablation but was seen in 12% of lesions < 4 months after RFA. No difference was appreciated on ill-defined perilesional enhancement with all methods combined or separately.
CONCLUSION: MRI findings after ablation are dependent on the treatment modality and the length of time between the procedure and follow-up examination.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted from 1998 to 2008. MRI studies were performed at 1.5 and 3 T and were acquired < 4, 4-9, and > 9 months after radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation, and microwave ablation. MR features were evaluated on the basis of signal intensity on unenhanced T1-weighted images and the presence of ill-defined perilesional enhancement, well-defined lesional enhancement, or washout on contrast-enhanced images. Imaging features were evaluated with all interventional modalities together and separately.
RESULTS: The study population was composed of 135 men and 36 women (203 ablated lesions) with a mean age of 65 years (range, 39-78 years). When the data for all treatment methods were combined, well-defined lesional enhancement and washout were significant findings among the resolved and unresolved outcome groups regardless of follow-up time category. After RFA, ablated areas had a tendency to show high signal intensity on T1 images, whereas low signal was seen after cryoablation and a hyperintense rim was seen after microwave ablation. Washout was only depicted 9 months after cryoablation but was seen in 12% of lesions < 4 months after RFA. No difference was appreciated on ill-defined perilesional enhancement with all methods combined or separately.
CONCLUSION: MRI findings after ablation are dependent on the treatment modality and the length of time between the procedure and follow-up examination.