Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy · 2021
Preliminary evaluation of the utility of optical coherence tomography in detecting structural changes during photobiomodulation treatment in patients with atrophic-erosive oral lichen planus.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gambino Alessio, Cabras Marco, Cafaro Adriana, Broccoletti Roberto, Carossa Stefano, Hopper Colin, Conrotto Davide, Porter Stephen R, Arduino Paolo G
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a common oral inflammatory condition. Against symptomatic atrophic-erosive OLP, topical steroids, or photobiomodulation (PBM) are deployed. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides a real-time, non-invasive, tissue investigation. Aim of this study was to evaluate modifications of OCT pattern in patients with painful atrophic-erosive OLP, before and after treatment with PBM, comparing those results with patients treated with topical steroid.
METHODS: Two groups of 20 OLP patients were evaluated. Group A underwent two daily application of 0.05 % clobetasol propionate for 8 weeks; group B was treated with eight weekly PBM sessions using a 980/645 nm diode laser. OCT scans were performed before and after treatment, and six months after end of the proposed protocol. Changes of width of stratified epithelium (EP) and lamina propria (LP) were quantified.
RESULTS: After 8-weeks, both groups experienced a significant increase of EP width (p < 0.05), and a significant decrease of LP width (p < 0.05), with Δ-EP in Group A significantly higher than Group B (p = 0.0015); conversely, Δ-LP was not significantly different (p > 0.05). After six months, significant increase of EP width remained only in group B (p = 0.01), with no significant decrease of LP mean width in both groups (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Increase of EP and decrease of LP might be explained as consequence of clobetasol and PBM ability to promote epithelial healing, and to reduce interface inflammation. When investigated with OCT, clobetasol appears to provide more significant short-term structural changes, whereas PBM might guarantee long-term alterations.
METHODS: Two groups of 20 OLP patients were evaluated. Group A underwent two daily application of 0.05 % clobetasol propionate for 8 weeks; group B was treated with eight weekly PBM sessions using a 980/645 nm diode laser. OCT scans were performed before and after treatment, and six months after end of the proposed protocol. Changes of width of stratified epithelium (EP) and lamina propria (LP) were quantified.
RESULTS: After 8-weeks, both groups experienced a significant increase of EP width (p < 0.05), and a significant decrease of LP width (p < 0.05), with Δ-EP in Group A significantly higher than Group B (p = 0.0015); conversely, Δ-LP was not significantly different (p > 0.05). After six months, significant increase of EP width remained only in group B (p = 0.01), with no significant decrease of LP mean width in both groups (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Increase of EP and decrease of LP might be explained as consequence of clobetasol and PBM ability to promote epithelial healing, and to reduce interface inflammation. When investigated with OCT, clobetasol appears to provide more significant short-term structural changes, whereas PBM might guarantee long-term alterations.