MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/odi.13741

Медицинская библиотека · Oral diseases · 2020

An appraisal of highest quality studies reporting malignant transformation of oral lichen planus based on a systematic review.

González-Moles Miguel Ángel, Ramos-García Pablo, Warnakulasuriya Saman

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

We present a critical review of the papers published in the international scientific literature on malignant transformation of oral lichen planus (OLP). Our aim is to report the most realistic estimate of the proportion of OLP cases with malignant transformation based on the highest quality of evidence.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Following a literature search, we selected 89 papers that were published on this topic until November 2020. We applied to these papers an adaptation of the methodological quality criteria of the QUIPS tool and we ordered all of them according to their methodological quality. The papers that were in the upper quartile of methodological quality (10 papers) were selected and analyzed.

RESULTS

The pooled proportion (expressed as percentage) of malignant transformation of OLP reported in these high methodological quality papers was 2.28% (95% confidence intervals = 1.49-3.20).

CONCLUSIONS

We observe that the proportion of malignancy is higher in research carried out under strict methodological quality criteria. In this critical review, we propose criteria for conducting follow-up studies on OLP to report on malignant transformation under strict quality standards.

Для цитирования: González-Moles Miguel Ángel, Ramos-García Pablo, Warnakulasuriya Saman. An appraisal of highest quality studies reporting malignant transformation of oral lichen planus based on a systematic review.. Oral diseases. 2020. DOI: 10.1111/odi.13741.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.