International journal of cardiology · 2023
Left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral improves outcome prediction in patients with secondary mitral regurgitation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gentile Francesco, Buoncristiani Francesco, Sciarrone Paolo, Bazan Lorenzo, Panichella Giorgia, Gasparini Simone, Chubuchny Vlad, Taddei Claudia, Poggianti Elisa, Fabiani Iacopo, Petersen Christina, Lancellotti Patrizio, Passino Claudio, Emdin Michele, Giannoni Alberto
Аннотация
AIMS: Left ventricular outflow velocity-time integral (LVOT-VTI) has been shown to improve outcome prediction in different patients' subsets, with or without heart failure (HF). Nevertheless, the prognostic value of LVOT-VTI in patients with HF and secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) has never been investigated so far. Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to assess the prognostic value different metrics of LV forward output, including LVOT-VTI, in HF patients with secondary MR.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with HF and moderate-to-severe/severe secondary MR and systolic dysfunction (i.e., left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <50%) were retrospectively selected and followed-up for the primary endpoint of cardiac death. Out of the 287 patients analyzed (aged 74 ± 11 years, 70% men, 46% ischemic etiology, mean LVEF 30 ± 9%, mean LVOT-VTI 20 ± 5 cm), 71 met the primary endpoint over a 33-month median follow-up (16-47 months). Patients with an LVOT-VTI ≤17 cm (n = 96, 32%) showed the greatest risk of cardiac death (Log Rank 44.3, p < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (Log rank 8.6, p = 0.003). At multivariable regression analysis, all the measures of LV forward volume (namely LVOT-VTI, stroke volume index, cardiac output, and cardiac index) were predictors of poor outcomes. Among these, LVOT-VTI was the most accurate in risk prediction (univariable C-statistics 0.70 [95%CI 0.64-0.77]).
CONCLUSION: Left ventricular forward output, noninvasively estimated through LVOT-VTI, improves outcome prediction in HF patients with low LVEF and secondary MR.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with HF and moderate-to-severe/severe secondary MR and systolic dysfunction (i.e., left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <50%) were retrospectively selected and followed-up for the primary endpoint of cardiac death. Out of the 287 patients analyzed (aged 74 ± 11 years, 70% men, 46% ischemic etiology, mean LVEF 30 ± 9%, mean LVOT-VTI 20 ± 5 cm), 71 met the primary endpoint over a 33-month median follow-up (16-47 months). Patients with an LVOT-VTI ≤17 cm (n = 96, 32%) showed the greatest risk of cardiac death (Log Rank 44.3, p < 0.001) and all-cause mortality (Log rank 8.6, p = 0.003). At multivariable regression analysis, all the measures of LV forward volume (namely LVOT-VTI, stroke volume index, cardiac output, and cardiac index) were predictors of poor outcomes. Among these, LVOT-VTI was the most accurate in risk prediction (univariable C-statistics 0.70 [95%CI 0.64-0.77]).
CONCLUSION: Left ventricular forward output, noninvasively estimated through LVOT-VTI, improves outcome prediction in HF patients with low LVEF and secondary MR.