Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2014
Secondary surgery after sleeve gastrectomy: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Homan Jens, Betzel Bark, Aarts Edo O, van Laarhoven Kees J H M, Janssen Ignace M C, Berends Frits J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has gained popularity as a stand-alone procedure with good short-term results for weight loss. However, in the long-term, weight regain and other complications are reported. Demand for secondary surgery is rising, partly for these reasons.
OBJECTIVES: To review the indications and effects of secondary surgery, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), after LSG.
METHODS: Data from all patients who underwent revision of LSG was retrospectively analyzed, concerning data on indications for secondary surgery, weight loss, and complications.
RESULTS: 43 Patients underwent secondary surgery after LSG; 25 BPD/DS and 18 LRYGB, respectively. Main indications for secondary surgery were inadequate weight loss (n = 17 [40%]) and weight regain (n = 8 [19%]). For these indications, the median excess weight loss was greater for BPD/DS (59% [range 15-113]) compared to LRYGB (23% [range -49-84]) (P = .008) after 34 months (range 14-79). In case of dysphagia or gastroesophageal reflux disease the complaints resolved after converting to LRYGB. BPD/DS patients were more likely to develop a short-term complication and vitamin deficiencies compared to LRYGB.
CONCLUSIONS: Secondary surgery of LSG to BPD/DS or LRYGB is feasible with slightly more complications after BPD/DS. Conversion to LRYGB is preferred in cases of dysphagia or gastroesophageal reflux disease. In cases of weight regain or insufficient weight loss after LSG, patients had better weight loss with a BPD/DS; however, this procedure has the risk of complications, such as severe vitamin deficiencies.
OBJECTIVES: To review the indications and effects of secondary surgery, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), after LSG.
METHODS: Data from all patients who underwent revision of LSG was retrospectively analyzed, concerning data on indications for secondary surgery, weight loss, and complications.
RESULTS: 43 Patients underwent secondary surgery after LSG; 25 BPD/DS and 18 LRYGB, respectively. Main indications for secondary surgery were inadequate weight loss (n = 17 [40%]) and weight regain (n = 8 [19%]). For these indications, the median excess weight loss was greater for BPD/DS (59% [range 15-113]) compared to LRYGB (23% [range -49-84]) (P = .008) after 34 months (range 14-79). In case of dysphagia or gastroesophageal reflux disease the complaints resolved after converting to LRYGB. BPD/DS patients were more likely to develop a short-term complication and vitamin deficiencies compared to LRYGB.
CONCLUSIONS: Secondary surgery of LSG to BPD/DS or LRYGB is feasible with slightly more complications after BPD/DS. Conversion to LRYGB is preferred in cases of dysphagia or gastroesophageal reflux disease. In cases of weight regain or insufficient weight loss after LSG, patients had better weight loss with a BPD/DS; however, this procedure has the risk of complications, such as severe vitamin deficiencies.