Personalized diagnosis in suspected myocardial infarction.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Neumann Johannes Tobias, Twerenbold Raphael, Ojeda Francisco, Aldous Sally J, Allen Brandon R, Apple Fred S, Babel Hugo, Christenson Robert H, Cullen Louise, Di Carluccio Eleonora, Doudesis Dimitrios, Ekelund Ulf, Giannitsis Evangelos, Greenslade Jaimi, Inoue Kenji, Jernberg Tomas, Kavsak Peter, Keller Till, Lee Kuan Ken, Lindahl Bertil, Lorenz Thiess, Mahler Simon A, Mills Nicholas L, Mokhtari Arash, Parsonage William, Pickering John W, Pemberton Christopher J, Reich Christoph, Richards A Mark, Sandoval Yader, Than Martin P, Toprak Betül, Troughton Richard W, Worster Andrew, Zeller Tanja, Ziegler Andreas, Blankenberg Stefan, ARTEMIS study group
Аннотация
METHODS: In 2,575 patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected MI, two ensembles of machine-learning models using single or serial concentrations of six different hs-cTn assays were derived to estimate the individual MI probability (ARTEMIS model). Discriminative performance of the models was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and logLoss. Model performance was validated in an external cohort with 1688 patients and tested for global generalizability in 13 international cohorts with 23,411 patients.
RESULTS: Eleven routinely available variables including age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors, electrocardiography, and hs-cTn were included in the ARTEMIS models. In the validation and generalization cohorts, excellent discriminative performance was confirmed, superior to hs-cTn only. For the serial hs-cTn measurement model, AUC ranged from 0.92 to 0.98. Good calibration was observed. Using a single hs-cTn measurement, the ARTEMIS model allowed direct rule-out of MI with very high and similar safety but up to tripled efficiency compared to the guideline-recommended strategy.
CONCLUSION: We developed and validated diagnostic models to accurately estimate the individual probability of MI, which allow for variable hs-cTn use and flexible timing of resampling. Their digital application may provide rapid, safe and efficient personalized patient care.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: Data of following cohorts were used for this project: BACC ( www.
CLINICALTRIALS: gov ; NCT02355457), stenoCardia ( www.
CLINICALTRIALS: gov ; NCT03227159), ADAPT-BSN ( www.australianclinicaltrials.gov.au ; ACTRN12611001069943), IMPACT ( www.australianclinicaltrials.gov.au , ACTRN12611000206921), ADAPT-RCT ( www.anzctr.org.au ; ANZCTR12610000766011), EDACS-RCT ( www.anzctr.org.au ; ANZCTR12613000745741); DROP-ACS ( https://www.umin.ac.jp , UMIN000030668); High-STEACS ( www.
CLINICALTRIALS: gov ; NCT01852123), LUND ( www.
CLINICALTRIALS: gov ; NCT05484544), RAPID-CPU ( www.
CLINICALTRIALS: gov ; NCT03111862), ROMI ( www.
CLINICALTRIALS: gov ; NCT01994577), SAMIE ( https://anzctr.org.au ; ACTRN12621000053820), SEIGE and SAFETY ( www.
CLINICALTRIALS: gov ; NCT04772157), STOP-CP ( www.
CLINICALTRIALS: gov ; NCT02984436), UTROPIA ( www.
CLINICALTRIALS: gov ; NCT02060760).