Coronary artery disease · 2022
Predictive value of high-sensitivity troponin for significant coronary artery disease in new-onset atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Butt Zaran A, Fitzgerald Gerald, O'Dea Grace, O'Herlihy Fergus, Casey Aoife, Bennett Kathleen, Murphy Ross T, Sheahan Richard
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: High-sensitivity troponin-T (HS-cTnT) levels are often measured in patients presenting with atrial fibrillation (AF), with many subjected to unnecessary invasive assessments. The significance of a normal or mildly raised HS-cTnT in this context is poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the predictive value of HS-cTnT for significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in new AF with rapid ventricular response. We also compared the discriminative ability of HS-cTnT to suspected angina for significant CAD.
METHODS: We examined patients presenting with new AF to two tertiary Irish centers in a defined period. Those included had HS-cTnT taken at presentation and subsequent ischemic evaluation.
RESULTS: Of 5350 cases screened for inclusion, 281 were deemed eligible. Of these, 148 and 133 patients had a positive and negative index HS-cTnT, respectively. Of those with negative HS-cTnT, 13 (9.8%) had significant CAD versus 51 (34.5%) with positive HS-cTnT (P < 0.001). Positive Hs-cTnT status remained significant upon multivariate analysis (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.37-6.14; P = 0.005). A similar model where HS-cTnT was replaced with suspected angina produced an OR of 1.64 (95% CI, 0.75-3.59; P = 0.213). A logistic model determined optimal cutoff value for HS-cTnT to be less than 30 ng/l, producing a negative predictive value of 91.8% and area under the receiver operative curve of 83.36.
CONCLUSION: HS-cTnT exhibits potential as an effective screening biomarker to predict nonsignificant CAD in new rapid AF, allowing more targeted and rationalized ischemic testing. HS-cTnT may also be a more accurate predictor of significant CAD than clinically suspected stable angina.Graphical abstract: http://links.lww.com/MCA/A540.
METHODS: We examined patients presenting with new AF to two tertiary Irish centers in a defined period. Those included had HS-cTnT taken at presentation and subsequent ischemic evaluation.
RESULTS: Of 5350 cases screened for inclusion, 281 were deemed eligible. Of these, 148 and 133 patients had a positive and negative index HS-cTnT, respectively. Of those with negative HS-cTnT, 13 (9.8%) had significant CAD versus 51 (34.5%) with positive HS-cTnT (P < 0.001). Positive Hs-cTnT status remained significant upon multivariate analysis (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.37-6.14; P = 0.005). A similar model where HS-cTnT was replaced with suspected angina produced an OR of 1.64 (95% CI, 0.75-3.59; P = 0.213). A logistic model determined optimal cutoff value for HS-cTnT to be less than 30 ng/l, producing a negative predictive value of 91.8% and area under the receiver operative curve of 83.36.
CONCLUSION: HS-cTnT exhibits potential as an effective screening biomarker to predict nonsignificant CAD in new rapid AF, allowing more targeted and rationalized ischemic testing. HS-cTnT may also be a more accurate predictor of significant CAD than clinically suspected stable angina.Graphical abstract: http://links.lww.com/MCA/A540.