Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2023
Increased FH-Risk-Score and Diabetes Are Cardiovascular Risk Equivalents in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia.
Наблюдательное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Paquette Martine, Cariou Bertrand, Bernard Sophie, Hegele Robert A, Gallo Antonio, Genest Jacques, Trinder Mark, Brunham Liam R, Béliard Sophie, Baass Alexis
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic condition causing premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). It is well established that patients with FH should be treated with statin therapy. However, there exists discordance concerning low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering goals in the management of these patients between different guidelines worldwide. The objective was to compare the 10-year ASCVD risk of different subgroups of patients with and without FH including those with diabetes or a history of ASCVD and patients with FH within different FH-Risk-Score categories.
METHODS: This multinational observational study used data from 3 different prospective cohorts. A total of 3383 FH and 6917 non-FH controls matched for age and sex were included (104 363 person-years of follow-up). The 10-year incident ASCVD risk was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, whereas the relative risk was estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models.
RESULTS: FH patients with a high (score >20%) FH-Risk-Score (hazard ratio, 8.45 [95% CI, 6.69-10.67]; P<0.0001), FH patients with diabetes (hazard ratio, 7.67 [95% CI, 4.82-12.21]; P<0.0001), and non-FH patients with ASCVD (hazard ratio, 6.78 [95% CI, 5.45-8.42]; P<0.0001) had a significantly higher incident ASCVD risk over 10 years than the reference group (non-FH without ASCVD or diabetes). The observed 10-year risks in these groups were 32.1%, 30.8%, 30.0%, and 5.1%, respectively. The 10-year ASCVD risk associated with both FH and ASCVD was extremely high (observed risk of 50.7%; hazard ratio, 14.53 [95% CI, 12.14-17.38]; P<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study strongly suggests that the observed risk of FH patients with diabetes, history of ASCVD, and FH-Risk-Score >20% is as high or higher than non-FH individuals with a history of ASCVD. More aggressive management should be recommended for these patients.
METHODS: This multinational observational study used data from 3 different prospective cohorts. A total of 3383 FH and 6917 non-FH controls matched for age and sex were included (104 363 person-years of follow-up). The 10-year incident ASCVD risk was assessed using Kaplan-Meier estimates, whereas the relative risk was estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models.
RESULTS: FH patients with a high (score >20%) FH-Risk-Score (hazard ratio, 8.45 [95% CI, 6.69-10.67]; P<0.0001), FH patients with diabetes (hazard ratio, 7.67 [95% CI, 4.82-12.21]; P<0.0001), and non-FH patients with ASCVD (hazard ratio, 6.78 [95% CI, 5.45-8.42]; P<0.0001) had a significantly higher incident ASCVD risk over 10 years than the reference group (non-FH without ASCVD or diabetes). The observed 10-year risks in these groups were 32.1%, 30.8%, 30.0%, and 5.1%, respectively. The 10-year ASCVD risk associated with both FH and ASCVD was extremely high (observed risk of 50.7%; hazard ratio, 14.53 [95% CI, 12.14-17.38]; P<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study strongly suggests that the observed risk of FH patients with diabetes, history of ASCVD, and FH-Risk-Score >20% is as high or higher than non-FH individuals with a history of ASCVD. More aggressive management should be recommended for these patients.