Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2023
Two-center validation of assays for the detection of binding and neutralizing anti-factor VIII antibodies.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Müller Jens, Neimanis Sonja, Kahle Jörg, Albert Thilo, Schultze Strasser Stephan, Rup Bonita, Pötzsch Bernd, Königs Christoph, Oldenburg Johannes, ABIRISK Consortium
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Patients with hemophilia A treated with coagulation Factor VIII (FVIII) products are at risk for developing anti-FVIII antibodies. The ABIRISK Consortium aimed to provide knowledge on the formation and detection of anti-drug antibodies against biopharmaceutical products, including FVIII. Accordingly, standardized and validated assays for the detection of binding (total) and neutralizing antibodies are needed.
AIM: Two-center validation of an ELISA for the detection of total FVIII-binding IgG-antibodies and Nijmegen-Bethesda assays for the quantification of FVIII-neutralizing antibodies according to consensus validation guidelines.
METHODS: Validation of assays at both sites was done according to published recommendations and included preanalytics, the determination of key assay parameters, including cut-points, assay sensitivity, precision, and FVIII interference.
RESULTS: The validated assays reproducibly detected FVIII-binding and -neutralizing antibodies with comparable performance in both laboratories. Floating screening cut-points were established for both assays. Determined mass-based sensitivity of both assays (all values ≤66 ng/mL) complied with the minimum sensitivity for the detection of anti-drug antibodies as recommended by the FDA (<100 ng/mL). Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation did not exceed 25%. Assay validation further revealed that pre-analytical heat treatment led to potentially false-positive ELISA results, while up to 0.15 IU/mL, residual FVIII showed no significant impact. Overall, good agreement of results was found for patient samples analyzed at both study sites.
CONCLUSION: Comprehensive validation of different anti-FVIII-antibody assays in two laboratories gave novel insights into the impact of pre-analytical sample treatment as well as the comparability of test results generated by the use of methodically different assays.
AIM: Two-center validation of an ELISA for the detection of total FVIII-binding IgG-antibodies and Nijmegen-Bethesda assays for the quantification of FVIII-neutralizing antibodies according to consensus validation guidelines.
METHODS: Validation of assays at both sites was done according to published recommendations and included preanalytics, the determination of key assay parameters, including cut-points, assay sensitivity, precision, and FVIII interference.
RESULTS: The validated assays reproducibly detected FVIII-binding and -neutralizing antibodies with comparable performance in both laboratories. Floating screening cut-points were established for both assays. Determined mass-based sensitivity of both assays (all values ≤66 ng/mL) complied with the minimum sensitivity for the detection of anti-drug antibodies as recommended by the FDA (<100 ng/mL). Intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation did not exceed 25%. Assay validation further revealed that pre-analytical heat treatment led to potentially false-positive ELISA results, while up to 0.15 IU/mL, residual FVIII showed no significant impact. Overall, good agreement of results was found for patient samples analyzed at both study sites.
CONCLUSION: Comprehensive validation of different anti-FVIII-antibody assays in two laboratories gave novel insights into the impact of pre-analytical sample treatment as well as the comparability of test results generated by the use of methodically different assays.