Comparative Evaluation of Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction Systems for DNA and RNA Viral Target.

BACKGROUND

Efficient nucleic acid extraction is essential for reliable viral load testing, yet performance can differ widely depending on the extraction system and sample type. We compared three automated platforms, QIAcube, EZ1 Advanced, and Maxwell RSC, for their ability to recover cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNA and West Nile virus (WNV) RNA from common clinical matrices.

METHODS

Mock specimens were prepared using whole blood, plasma, serum, and urine collected from two donors. Samples were spiked with CMV or WNV culture material and extracted in triplicate on each platform according to the manufacturers' protocols. Viral loads were measured using ELITech ELITE MGB assays on the InGenius system. Whole blood samples were also tested after a 1:4 dilution. Matrix-specific standard curves were applied, and viral loads were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests with false-discovery rate adjustment.

RESULTS

Extraction efficiency differed substantially by platform and specimen type. For CMV, QIAcube consistently produced the highest DNA recovery across all matrices, with particularly large differences in plasma and serum, where EZ1 and Maxwell RSC yielded significantly lower loads. The WNV results varied by matrix: EZ1 and QIAcube performed similarly in plasma, while Maxwell RSC achieved the highest RNA recovery in whole blood. While the QIAcube exhibited reduced WNV recovery in blood, it achieved the best performance in serum, as specified by the kit. No significant platform differences were observed for urine. Diluting whole blood reduced variability between platforms.

CONCLUSIONS

Both sample matrix and extraction system strongly influence nucleic acid recovery. These results highlight the need for matrix-specific validation and standardized extraction approaches in molecular diagnostics.