Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980) · 2015
Quantification of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis with 3D Ultrasound Angiography.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pelz J O, Weinreich A, Fritzsch D, Saur D
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate a new method of three-dimensional ultrasound (3D-US) angiography of carotid vessels including 3D-US quantification of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (ICAS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two neurologists performed native ultrasound scans of the brain-supplying carotid arteries in 73 probands (including 22 patients with 25 cases of ICAS) using a Toshiba Aplio 500 ultrasound machine equipped with the 3 D application of Curefab CS. Additionally, 25 probands underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the neck vessels.
RESULTS: The mean length of the proximal ICA was 32.1 mm ± 9.8 mm & 31.3 mm ± 9.0 mm (each n = 97). The interrater reliability (intraclass correlation, ICC) was 0.75 ± 0.23 for the common carotid artery (CCA, n = 90) and 0.78 ± 0.21 (n = 92) for the ICA. The intermethod agreement between 3D-US angiography and CE-MRA was 0.67 ± 0.19 (n = 45) & 0.66 ± 0.19 (n = 44) for the CCA and 0.79 ± 0.17 (n = 47) & 0.75 ± 0.19 (n = 46) for the ICA. Quantification of ICAS applying 3D-US in comparison to 2D color-coded duplexsonography (2D-CDS) showed a moderate to good intermethod agreement both by the Bland and Altman analysis and by ICC (0.8 & 0.72; with each p < 0.001). The interrater reliability for quantification of ICAS was 0.79; p < 0.001.
CONCLUSION: Native 3D-US angiography of carotid vessels shows good interrater and intermethod agreement in comparison to CE-MRA. Together with a moderate to good intermethod and interrater agreement in the quantification of ICAS, when compared to 2D-CDS, 3D-US angiography is thus a promising complementary imaging technique for carotid artery disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two neurologists performed native ultrasound scans of the brain-supplying carotid arteries in 73 probands (including 22 patients with 25 cases of ICAS) using a Toshiba Aplio 500 ultrasound machine equipped with the 3 D application of Curefab CS. Additionally, 25 probands underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of the neck vessels.
RESULTS: The mean length of the proximal ICA was 32.1 mm ± 9.8 mm & 31.3 mm ± 9.0 mm (each n = 97). The interrater reliability (intraclass correlation, ICC) was 0.75 ± 0.23 for the common carotid artery (CCA, n = 90) and 0.78 ± 0.21 (n = 92) for the ICA. The intermethod agreement between 3D-US angiography and CE-MRA was 0.67 ± 0.19 (n = 45) & 0.66 ± 0.19 (n = 44) for the CCA and 0.79 ± 0.17 (n = 47) & 0.75 ± 0.19 (n = 46) for the ICA. Quantification of ICAS applying 3D-US in comparison to 2D color-coded duplexsonography (2D-CDS) showed a moderate to good intermethod agreement both by the Bland and Altman analysis and by ICC (0.8 & 0.72; with each p < 0.001). The interrater reliability for quantification of ICAS was 0.79; p < 0.001.
CONCLUSION: Native 3D-US angiography of carotid vessels shows good interrater and intermethod agreement in comparison to CE-MRA. Together with a moderate to good intermethod and interrater agreement in the quantification of ICAS, when compared to 2D-CDS, 3D-US angiography is thus a promising complementary imaging technique for carotid artery disease.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAtherosclerosisCarotid Artery, InternalCarotid Artery, Internal, DissectionCarotid Intima-Media ThicknessCarotid StenosisCerebral AngiographyContrast MediaFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsYoung Adult