Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2021
Optimizing correction of coma aberration in keratoconus with a novel soft contact lens.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Suzaki Asaki, Koh Shizuka, Maeda Naoyuki, Asonuma Sanae, Santodomingo-Rubido Jacinto, Oie Yoshinori, Soma Takeshi, Fujikado Takashi, Nishida Kohji
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To report on a second-generation prototype contact lens (modified lens) with enhanced optics to correct coma aberration and compare its performance with that of the prototype contact lens (conventional lens) used to optimise correction of coma aberration in keratoconus (KC).
METHODS: Both lenses were designed as a set of standardised soft contact lenses (SCLs) with asymmetric powers along the posterior surface. The modified lens differs from the conventional lens in that the optical zone is decentred superiorly by 0.7 mm. The on-eye performance was compared between the SCLs and no-lens wearing in terms of manifest refraction, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), ocular aberrations, subjective quality of vision, and on-eye lens position relative to the pupil.
RESULTS: Thirty-four KC eyes were included. SCLs significantly decreased coma aberration compared to no-lens wear (none, 0.68 ± 0.27 μm; conventional lens, 0.37 ± 0.28 μm; modified lens, 0.19 ± 0.15 μm; P < 0.001), with the reduction in coma aberration being significantly greater with the modified lens than with the conventional lens (P = 0.018). No significant difference in manifest refraction or CDVA was found among the three conditions. Quality of vision was significantly better with the modified lens than with no SCL wear (P < 0.05) but no differences were found between the SCLs. The on-eye optical center position relative to the pupil was closer to the pupil centre using the modified lens than the conventional lens (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Optimisation of the location of the optical zone in a standardised asymmetric SCL improves correction of coma aberrations and on-eye optical centration.
METHODS: Both lenses were designed as a set of standardised soft contact lenses (SCLs) with asymmetric powers along the posterior surface. The modified lens differs from the conventional lens in that the optical zone is decentred superiorly by 0.7 mm. The on-eye performance was compared between the SCLs and no-lens wearing in terms of manifest refraction, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), ocular aberrations, subjective quality of vision, and on-eye lens position relative to the pupil.
RESULTS: Thirty-four KC eyes were included. SCLs significantly decreased coma aberration compared to no-lens wear (none, 0.68 ± 0.27 μm; conventional lens, 0.37 ± 0.28 μm; modified lens, 0.19 ± 0.15 μm; P < 0.001), with the reduction in coma aberration being significantly greater with the modified lens than with the conventional lens (P = 0.018). No significant difference in manifest refraction or CDVA was found among the three conditions. Quality of vision was significantly better with the modified lens than with no SCL wear (P < 0.05) but no differences were found between the SCLs. The on-eye optical center position relative to the pupil was closer to the pupil centre using the modified lens than the conventional lens (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Optimisation of the location of the optical zone in a standardised asymmetric SCL improves correction of coma aberrations and on-eye optical centration.