Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2021
Comparison of pulsed and continuous accelerated corneal crosslinking for keratoconus: 1-year results at a single center.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kang Min-Ji, Hwang Jehyung, Chung So-Hyang
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes between pulsed and continuous accelerated crosslinking (CXL) for keratoconus.
SETTING: Hospital.
DESIGN: Retrospective comparison study.
METHODS: Korean patients who were treated for keratoconus between September 2015 and January 2018 at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital were included. Eyes were subjected to pulsed accelerated crosslinking (30 mW/cm2 for 8 minutes, 1 second on/1 second off) or continuous accelerated crosslinking (30 mW/cm2 for 4 minutes; delivering 7.2 J/cm2). Outcomes were evaluated after 1 year.
RESULTS: At 1 year, the 2 groups did not exhibit changes in their corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity values. The pulsed group (25 eyes in 25 patients) exhibited significantly improved values for sphere (P = .009) and spherical equivalent (P = .033), although no statistically significant difference was observed in the continuous group (20 eyes in 20 patients). All keratometry (k)values (SimKf, SimKs, SimKmean, and Kmax) improved in both groups (all P < .05), although the pulsed group had significantly greater changes in the SimKmean value (P = .036) and the Kmax value (P = .03). Both groups had significantly decreased central and thinnest corneal thicknesses (all P < .001), although the pulsed group had a substantially lower thinnest corneal thickness (P = .017). Corneal densitometry measured using the Pentacam device increased in both groups (all P < .001), with a higher densitometry value in the pulsed group (P = .013). Furthermore, the depth of the demarcation line was deeper in the pulsed group (P = .015).
CONCLUSIONS: Pulsed accelerated crosslinking might provide better postcrosslinking effects than continuous accelerated crosslinking.
SETTING: Hospital.
DESIGN: Retrospective comparison study.
METHODS: Korean patients who were treated for keratoconus between September 2015 and January 2018 at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital were included. Eyes were subjected to pulsed accelerated crosslinking (30 mW/cm2 for 8 minutes, 1 second on/1 second off) or continuous accelerated crosslinking (30 mW/cm2 for 4 minutes; delivering 7.2 J/cm2). Outcomes were evaluated after 1 year.
RESULTS: At 1 year, the 2 groups did not exhibit changes in their corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity values. The pulsed group (25 eyes in 25 patients) exhibited significantly improved values for sphere (P = .009) and spherical equivalent (P = .033), although no statistically significant difference was observed in the continuous group (20 eyes in 20 patients). All keratometry (k)values (SimKf, SimKs, SimKmean, and Kmax) improved in both groups (all P < .05), although the pulsed group had significantly greater changes in the SimKmean value (P = .036) and the Kmax value (P = .03). Both groups had significantly decreased central and thinnest corneal thicknesses (all P < .001), although the pulsed group had a substantially lower thinnest corneal thickness (P = .017). Corneal densitometry measured using the Pentacam device increased in both groups (all P < .001), with a higher densitometry value in the pulsed group (P = .013). Furthermore, the depth of the demarcation line was deeper in the pulsed group (P = .015).
CONCLUSIONS: Pulsed accelerated crosslinking might provide better postcrosslinking effects than continuous accelerated crosslinking.