MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/bjd.20750

Медицинская библиотека · The British journal of dermatology · 2021

Antimicrobial peptides in hidradenitis suppurativa: a systematic review.

Yao Y, Frew J W, Thomsen S F, Ring H C

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease of the hair follicle defined by recurrent nodules, tunnels and scarring involving the intertriginous regions. HS is associated with microbial dysbiosis and immune dysregulation. In HS, an increasing number of studies have investigated antimicrobial peptides (AMPs).

OBJECTIVES

To provide an overview of the literature on AMPs in HS, and to discuss the potential role of AMPs in the pathogenesis of HS.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched. The titles, abstracts and full texts of all articles were manually screened. Additionally, the reference lists of the included articles were screened and hand searched for relevant studies.

RESULTS

The final literature sample comprised 18 retrospective and prospective studies (no reviews or commentaries) published between 2009 and 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

This review demonstrates the multitude of AMPs in HS. Although the methodology of the studies varied, the included studies indicate a consistent overexpression of human β-defensin (hBD)-2, S100A7, S100A8 and S100A9 at both the mRNA and protein levels, and a decreased expression of hBD-1. Overall, the studies point to a dysregulation of AMPs in both lesional and nonlesional HS skin.

Для цитирования: Yao Y, Frew J W, Thomsen S F, Ring H C. Antimicrobial peptides in hidradenitis suppurativa: a systematic review.. The British journal of dermatology. 2021. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.20750.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.