Journal of psychiatric research · 2025
Impact of the changes from ICD-10 to ICD-11 in the diagnosis of depressive disorder in the general population.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Francia Lea, Miret Marta, Lara Elvira, Dolz Del Castellar Blanca, Domenech-Abella Joan, Olaya Beatriz, Haro Josep Maria, Cuadrado Daniel Morillo, Ayuso Mateos José Luis
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recently revised the criteria for the diagnosis of depressive disorders in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). This most recent version of the classification (ICD-11) presents some notable differences from the previous one that may impact the prevalence rate.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the impact of changes on the diagnosis of depressive episodes in the general population.
METHOD: We used a general population sample (n = 2911; Age, M = 59; Gender, 56 % women) from the project 'Edad con Salud' using face-to-face interviews based on the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Instrument. To explore the impact of changes between ICD-10 and ICD-11, we compared participants with a diagnosis of a depressive disorder and those without, as well as participants who presented depression in only one of the two versions.
RESULTS: When using the ICD-10 criteria, we identified 189 cases of depressive episodes against 186 with ICD-11. Five and two participants were respectively diagnosed only with ICD-10 and ICD-11. The weighted lifetime prevalence is identical using both diagnostic criteria (6.3 %).
CONCLUSION: Despite the changes introduced in the classification, the prevalence of depressive episodes identified by ICD-10 and ICD-11 in a general population sample is almost identical.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the impact of changes on the diagnosis of depressive episodes in the general population.
METHOD: We used a general population sample (n = 2911; Age, M = 59; Gender, 56 % women) from the project 'Edad con Salud' using face-to-face interviews based on the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Instrument. To explore the impact of changes between ICD-10 and ICD-11, we compared participants with a diagnosis of a depressive disorder and those without, as well as participants who presented depression in only one of the two versions.
RESULTS: When using the ICD-10 criteria, we identified 189 cases of depressive episodes against 186 with ICD-11. Five and two participants were respectively diagnosed only with ICD-10 and ICD-11. The weighted lifetime prevalence is identical using both diagnostic criteria (6.3 %).
CONCLUSION: Despite the changes introduced in the classification, the prevalence of depressive episodes identified by ICD-10 and ICD-11 in a general population sample is almost identical.