m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025

International multi-center study of middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma in cancer patients: Efficacy, safety, and outcomes in a high-risk population.

СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Gajjar Avi A, Salem Mohamed M, Sioutas Georgios S, Jabarkheel Rashad, Kuybu Okkes, Khalife Jane, Tonetti Daniel A, Cortez Gustavo, Dmytriw Adam A, Ortega Moreno Diego Alejandro, Smith William, Regenhardt Robert W, Carroll Kate T, Abecassis Zachary A, Ruiz Rodriguez Juan Francisco, Shekhtman Oleg, Hoang Alex Nguyen, Khalessi Alexander A, Baker Cordell, Matejka Matthias, Cancelliere Nicole M, Griessenauer Christoph J, Grandhi Ramesh, Kan Peter, Tanweer Omar, Levitt Michael R, Stapleton Christopher J, Pereira Vitor Mendes, Jankowitz Brian, Riina Howard A, Patel Aman B, Hanel Ricardo, Thomas Ajith J, Lang Michael J, Gross Bradley A, Burkhardt Jan-Karl, Srinivasan Visish M

Аннотация

BackgroundMiddle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is a promising treatment for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). Cancer patients are at risk for cSDH due to thrombocytopenia. The efficacy of MMAE in this population has not been studied.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 76 patients who underwent 94 MMAEs for cSDH at 12 tertiary centers across North America and Europe between February 2018 and January 2023. We analyzed patient demographics, clinical profiles, procedural details, and outcomes. The primary outcome was cSDH progression, while secondary outcomes included radiographic resolution, mortality, 90-day functional outcomes, functional improvement, and procedural complications.ResultsRadiographic improvement occurred in 88.5% of patients, and technical success was achieved in 96.8%, with comparable rates between the MMAE-only and MMAE + surgery groups. Complications occurred in five patients (5.3%), with no significant difference between groups (6.0% in MMAE vs. 3.7% in MMAE + surgery, p = 0.658). Hemorrhage was reported in four patients (4.3%), and no cases of stroke were recorded. Mortality was 24.5% overall, with a slightly higher rate in the MMAE + surgery group (29.6%) compared to the MMAE-only group (22.4%, p = 0.460). Functional improvement in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was seen in 15 patients (24.2%), with a significantly greater improvement in the combined group (Δ mRS = 2.625) versus the MMAE-only group (Δ mRS = 0.348, p < 0.001).ConclusionsMMAE is a safe and effective treatment option for managing cSDH in cancer patients. Higher mortality in this population is likely reflective of underlying cancer and comorbidities.

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты