American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2025
Risk Factors for Patient-Important Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Deane Adam M, Lauzier François, Adhikari Neill K J, Lamontagne François, Heels-Ansdell Diane, Thabane Lehana, Williamson David, Kanji Salmaan, Barletta Jeffrey F, Finfer Simon, Arabi Yaseen, Ostermann Marlies, Marshall John C, Zytaruk Nicole L, Hardie Miranda, Hammond Naomi E, Guyatt Gordon, White Kyle C, Burns Karen E A, Dionne Joanna C, Young Paul J, Cook Deborah J
Аннотация
Rationale: Patient-important gastrointestinal bleeding is an endpoint developed by patients and family members; however, risk factors for this outcome are unknown. Objectives: We sought to identify risk factors for patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding among invasively ventilated adults. Methods: This preplanned regression analysis of an international trial database evaluated baseline and time-varying risk factors in the preceding 3 days for patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding, accounting for illness severity and the competing risk of death. Measurements and Main Results: Patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding occurred in the ICU among 131 of 4,821 (2.7%) patients. Baseline APACHE II score-hazard ratio (HR), 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12, 1.37) per 5-point increase-and the following were associated with greater risk of patient-important bleeding: inotropes or vasopressors (HR, 2.05 [95% CI = 1.35, 3.12]), severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count, <50 × 109/L) (HR, 2.21 [95% CI = 1.24, 3.94]) and platelet inhibitor drugs (HR, 1.69 [95% CI = 1.11, 2.56]). A lower bleeding risk was associated with pantoprazole (HR, 0.36 [95% CI = 0.25, 0.54]) and enteral nutrition (HR, 0.81 [95% CI = 0.68, 0.97]) for every increase of 500 ml/d. There was no interaction between enteral nutrition and pantoprazole (interaction P = 0.94). Allocation to pantoprazole was associated with a lower risk of patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding regardless of the volume of enteral nutrition (for 500 ml/d: HR, 0.36 [95% CI = 0.22, 0.58]; for no enteral nutrition: HR, 0.36 [95% CI = 0.18, 0.72]). The association of enteral nutrition and bleeding was similar with pantoprazole (HR, 0.82 [95% CI = 0.63, 1.07]) or without pantoprazole (HR, 0.81 [95% CI = 0.66, 1.00]). Conclusions: Several factors are associated with the risk of patient-important upper gastrointestinal bleeding during invasive ventilation.