The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2023
Comparison of Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy Outcomes With or Without Bicanalicular Silicone Tube Intubation in Acquired Lacrimal Sac Mucocele.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lan Shan, Yu Jinqiang, Ke Feng, Li Dekun, Liu Zhenkai
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This paper was established to validate the necessity of bicanalicular silicone tube intubation (BSTI) in patients with acquired lacrimal sac mucocele (ALSM) receiving endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR).
METHODS: In total, 92 patients (92 eyes) diagnosed with ALSM undergone endoscopic DCR from November 2016 to December 2021 were recruited for our research. Patients were allocated into 2 equal treatment groups: group A (patients undergoing BSTI) and group B (patients not receiving this procedure). The tubes were removed 2 months postoperation in group A. Surgical outcomes and related complications were evaluated 12 months postoperation.
RESULTS: Ultimately, this study included 83 patients with ALSM, consisting of 43 patients in group A and 40 patients in group B. All patients exhibited notable mass shrinkage with the opening of the lacrimal sac during the surgery and the swelling in the lacrimal sac area was completely relieved within 5 days postoperation. At the 12-month follow-up, no distinct difference was observed in the anatomic success rate between the 2 groups (group A: 93.0%; group B: 90.0%) ( t = 0.010, P > 0.05). However, patients in group A presented higher functional success rates (90.7%) in contrast to those patients in group B (72.5%) ( t = 4.635, P < 0.05). In both groups, the failure of the lacrimal passage reconstruction was attributed to granulation tissue formation or scar formation at the ostium. No sac mucocele recurrence occurred during the follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic DCR treatment for ALSM achieves satisfactory postoperative effects without recurrence, and BSTI may improve the functional success rate.
METHODS: In total, 92 patients (92 eyes) diagnosed with ALSM undergone endoscopic DCR from November 2016 to December 2021 were recruited for our research. Patients were allocated into 2 equal treatment groups: group A (patients undergoing BSTI) and group B (patients not receiving this procedure). The tubes were removed 2 months postoperation in group A. Surgical outcomes and related complications were evaluated 12 months postoperation.
RESULTS: Ultimately, this study included 83 patients with ALSM, consisting of 43 patients in group A and 40 patients in group B. All patients exhibited notable mass shrinkage with the opening of the lacrimal sac during the surgery and the swelling in the lacrimal sac area was completely relieved within 5 days postoperation. At the 12-month follow-up, no distinct difference was observed in the anatomic success rate between the 2 groups (group A: 93.0%; group B: 90.0%) ( t = 0.010, P > 0.05). However, patients in group A presented higher functional success rates (90.7%) in contrast to those patients in group B (72.5%) ( t = 4.635, P < 0.05). In both groups, the failure of the lacrimal passage reconstruction was attributed to granulation tissue formation or scar formation at the ostium. No sac mucocele recurrence occurred during the follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic DCR treatment for ALSM achieves satisfactory postoperative effects without recurrence, and BSTI may improve the functional success rate.