Endoscopy · 1997
Diagnosing extrahepatic bile duct stones using intraductal ultrasonography: a case series.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ueno N, Nishizono T, Tamada K, Ichiyama M, Wada S, Tomiyama T, Tano S, Aizawa T, Kimura K
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Intraductal ultrasonography (IDUS), a new ultrasonographic diagnostic procedure, was used to assess the presence of extrahepatic bile duct stones.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The IDUS apparatus consisted of a 6-French high-frequency (20 MHz) probe. Prior to clinical application, in-vitro studies were conducted in a water tank. Clinically, IDUS was successful in 31 patients after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Interpretations of IDUS images were evaluated in comparison with cholangiographic and fluoroscopic findings.
RESULTS: Experimental testing demonstrated that stones or fragments were typically visualized as strong, high-echo images with acoustic shadowing; air bubbles were seen as fan-shaped high-echo areas or comet-shaped high-echo areas; and sludge was visualized as soft, easily changing, high-echo structures. Extrahepatic bile duct stones were visualized by IDUS in 30 of 31 patients (96.8%), while fluoroscopy and cholangiography identified 19 (61.3%) and 25 (80.6%), respectively. Accurate differentiation between stones and air bubbles was also possible.
CONCLUSION: IDUS could be a useful modality in the diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct stones.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The IDUS apparatus consisted of a 6-French high-frequency (20 MHz) probe. Prior to clinical application, in-vitro studies were conducted in a water tank. Clinically, IDUS was successful in 31 patients after endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Interpretations of IDUS images were evaluated in comparison with cholangiographic and fluoroscopic findings.
RESULTS: Experimental testing demonstrated that stones or fragments were typically visualized as strong, high-echo images with acoustic shadowing; air bubbles were seen as fan-shaped high-echo areas or comet-shaped high-echo areas; and sludge was visualized as soft, easily changing, high-echo structures. Extrahepatic bile duct stones were visualized by IDUS in 30 of 31 patients (96.8%), while fluoroscopy and cholangiography identified 19 (61.3%) and 25 (80.6%), respectively. Accurate differentiation between stones and air bubbles was also possible.
CONCLUSION: IDUS could be a useful modality in the diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct stones.