MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00007435-199603000-00007

Медицинская библиотека · Sexually transmitted diseases · 1996

Evaluation of vaginal tampons for collection of specimens for detection of Chlamydial infection.

Smith B L, Cummings M C, Benes S, McCormack W M

Клиническое исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have shown that self-inserted vaginal tampons can be used to obtain specimens for detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. There is a need to expand testing for infection with Chlamydia trachomatis to women who do not undergo regular gynecologic examinations.

GOAL: To compare self-inserted tampons with clinician-obtained endocervical swabs for collection of samples to be examined for chlamydial infection.

STUDY

DESIGN

Women referred because of recently detected untreated chlamydial infection inserted a vaginal tampon. Two endocervical swabs were obtained after the tampon was removed. One swab was cultured for Chlamydia trachomatis. The other swab and the tampon were examined with the Testpack Chlamydia antigen detection test.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine women were studied. Chlamydial infection was detected by culture in 75.4%, by Testpack (swab) in 63.8%, and by Testpack (tampon) in 52.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Tampon-obtained specimens evaluated in the Testpack Chlamydia test were relatively insensitive. More sensitive tests for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis infection with self-obtained specimens should be evaluated.

Для цитирования: Smith B L, Cummings M C, Benes S, McCormack W M. Evaluation of vaginal tampons for collection of specimens for detection of Chlamydial infection.. Sexually transmitted diseases. 1996. DOI: 10.1097/00007435-199603000-00007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.