DOI 10.1212/wnl.0000000000010748
Central nervous system involvement in Erdheim-Chester disease: An observational cohort study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
CNS involvement in Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) leads to substantial morbidity and mortality. To assess CNS manifestations in a French cohort of 253 patients with ECD, we determined clinical characteristics and outcomes, including those under targeted therapies.
METHODS
This was a retrospective longitudinal study. CNS manifestations were determined by clinical examination and brain or spine MRI. Targeted therapy efficacy was assessed using global assessment from a physician and a radiologist. The study was approved by the ethics committee Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France III.
RESULTS
Ninety-seven of 253 patients (38%) with ECD had CNS involvement. CNS involvement was significantly associated with a younger age at diagnosis (mean 55.5 years) and at symptom onset (mean 50.5 years), as well as with the presence of the BRAF V600E mutation (in 77% of cases), xanthelasma (34%), and diabetes insipidus (36%). Median survival among patients with CNS involvement was significantly lower than that of patients with ECD without CNS involvement (124 months vs 146 months, p = 0.03). Seventy-four CNS MRIs were centrally reviewed, which showed 3 patterns: tumoral in 66%, pseudo-degenerative in 50%, and vascular in 18%. Targeted therapy (BRAF or MEK inhibitors) was associated with improved symptoms in 43% of patients and MRI improvement in 45%.
CONCLUSIONS
CNS manifestations are typically associated with poor prognosis in patients with ECD. Three distinct patterns can be recognized: tumoral, pseudodegenerative, and vascular.
CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that targeted therapy leads to clinical or imaging improvement in almost 50% of patients.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.