Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology · 2012
Double-blind placebo-controlled study of mesalamine in post-infective irritable bowel syndrome--a pilot study.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tuteja Ashok K, Fang John C, Al-Suqi Manal, Stoddard Gregory J, Hale Devon C
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Post-infective irritable bowel syndrome (PI-IBS) is characterized by continuing symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome, typically diarrhea-predominant, following an episode of acute gastroenteritis. There is often an increase in sub-epithelial inflammatory and neuroendocrine cells on colonic mucosal biopsy. Mesalamine is an anti-inflammatory agent, effective in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. The goal of this study was to compare mesalamine to placebo on symptoms and quality-of-life (QOL) in PI-IBS.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients who developed diarrhea-predominant IBS after gastroenteritis were randomized to receive mesalamine (Asacol®) 1.6 gm b.i.d. or placebo for 12 weeks in a double-blind placebo-controlled study. QOL was assessed using the IBS-QOL questionnaire. Stool frequency, stool consistency, urgency, severity of abdominal pain, severity of bloating, and global-improvement scale were recorded in daily diaries for 7 days at baseline and every 4 weeks. Data were analyzed by comparing the change from baseline to last follow-up.
RESULTS: One patient withdrew after randomization; data were incomplete in two patients. Thus, data were analyzed from 17 patients (11 men and 6 women, median age: 27 years, range 22-45 years). Mesalamine was not associated with significant improvement in global symptoms, abdominal pain, bloating, stool urgency, frequency, or consistency (all p ≥ 0.11) or QOL (p ≥ 0.16).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant improvement in global symptoms or overall QOL with mesalamine in patients with PI-IBS.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients who developed diarrhea-predominant IBS after gastroenteritis were randomized to receive mesalamine (Asacol®) 1.6 gm b.i.d. or placebo for 12 weeks in a double-blind placebo-controlled study. QOL was assessed using the IBS-QOL questionnaire. Stool frequency, stool consistency, urgency, severity of abdominal pain, severity of bloating, and global-improvement scale were recorded in daily diaries for 7 days at baseline and every 4 weeks. Data were analyzed by comparing the change from baseline to last follow-up.
RESULTS: One patient withdrew after randomization; data were incomplete in two patients. Thus, data were analyzed from 17 patients (11 men and 6 women, median age: 27 years, range 22-45 years). Mesalamine was not associated with significant improvement in global symptoms, abdominal pain, bloating, stool urgency, frequency, or consistency (all p ≥ 0.11) or QOL (p ≥ 0.16).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant improvement in global symptoms or overall QOL with mesalamine in patients with PI-IBS.