European radiology · 2020
Prediction of tumor recurrence and poor survival of ampullary adenocarcinoma using preoperative clinical and CT findings.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yoen Heera, Kim Jung Hoon, Hur Bo Yun, Ahn Su Joa, Jeon Sun Kyung, Choi Seo-Youn, Lee Kyoung Bun, Han Joon Koo
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To predict poor survival and tumor recurrence in patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma using preoperative clinical and CT findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 216 patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma who underwent preoperative CT and surgery were retrospectively included. CT was assessed by two radiologists. Clinical and histopathological characteristics including histologic subtypes were investigated. A Cox proportional hazard model and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to identify disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). A nomogram was created based on the multivariate analysis. The optimal cutoff size of the tumor was evaluated and validated by internal cross validation.
RESULTS: The median OS was 62.8 ± 37.9, and the median DFS was 54.3 ± 41.2 months. For OS, tumor size (hazard ratio [HR] 2.79, p < 0.001), papillary bulging (HR 0.63, p = 0.049), organ invasion on CT (HR 1.92, p = 0.04), male sex (HR 1.59, p = 0.046), elevated CA 19-9 (HR 1.92, p = 0.01), pT stage (HR 2.45, p = 0.001), and pN stage (HR 3.04, p < 0.001) were important predictors of survival. In terms of recurrence, tumor size (HR 2.37, p = 0.04), pT stage (HR 1.76, p = 0.03), pN stage (HR 2.23, p = 0.001), and histologic differentiation (HR 4.31, p = 0.008) were important predictors of recurrence. In terms of tumor size on CT, 2.65 cm and 3.15 cm were significant cutoff values for poor OS and RFS (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative clinical and CT findings were useful to predict the outcomes of ampullary adenocarcinoma. In particular, tumor size, papillary bulging, organ invasion on CT, male sex, and elevated CA 19-9 were important predictors of poor survival after surgery.
KEY POINTS: • Clinical staging based on preoperative clinical information and CT findings can be useful to predict the prognosis of ampullary adenocarcinoma patients. • In terms of survival, tumor size (HR 2.79), papillary bulging (HR 0.63), organ invasion on CT (HR 1.92), male sex (HR 1.59), and elevated CA 19-9 (HR 1.92) were important clinical predictors of poor survival. • Tumor size on CT was of special importance for both poor overall survival and disease-free survival, with optimal cutoff values of 2.65 cm and 3.15 cm, respectively (p < 0.001).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 216 patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma who underwent preoperative CT and surgery were retrospectively included. CT was assessed by two radiologists. Clinical and histopathological characteristics including histologic subtypes were investigated. A Cox proportional hazard model and the Kaplan-Meier method were used to identify disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). A nomogram was created based on the multivariate analysis. The optimal cutoff size of the tumor was evaluated and validated by internal cross validation.
RESULTS: The median OS was 62.8 ± 37.9, and the median DFS was 54.3 ± 41.2 months. For OS, tumor size (hazard ratio [HR] 2.79, p < 0.001), papillary bulging (HR 0.63, p = 0.049), organ invasion on CT (HR 1.92, p = 0.04), male sex (HR 1.59, p = 0.046), elevated CA 19-9 (HR 1.92, p = 0.01), pT stage (HR 2.45, p = 0.001), and pN stage (HR 3.04, p < 0.001) were important predictors of survival. In terms of recurrence, tumor size (HR 2.37, p = 0.04), pT stage (HR 1.76, p = 0.03), pN stage (HR 2.23, p = 0.001), and histologic differentiation (HR 4.31, p = 0.008) were important predictors of recurrence. In terms of tumor size on CT, 2.65 cm and 3.15 cm were significant cutoff values for poor OS and RFS (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative clinical and CT findings were useful to predict the outcomes of ampullary adenocarcinoma. In particular, tumor size, papillary bulging, organ invasion on CT, male sex, and elevated CA 19-9 were important predictors of poor survival after surgery.
KEY POINTS: • Clinical staging based on preoperative clinical information and CT findings can be useful to predict the prognosis of ampullary adenocarcinoma patients. • In terms of survival, tumor size (HR 2.79), papillary bulging (HR 0.63), organ invasion on CT (HR 1.92), male sex (HR 1.59), and elevated CA 19-9 (HR 1.92) were important clinical predictors of poor survival. • Tumor size on CT was of special importance for both poor overall survival and disease-free survival, with optimal cutoff values of 2.65 cm and 3.15 cm, respectively (p < 0.001).