Cirugia y cirujanos · 2019
Ampulary tumors: presurgical staging by endoscopic ultrasonography. Diagnostic test study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Membrillo-Romero Alejandro, Fuente-Lira Mauricio De la, Carvallo-Guevara Patricia, Rendón-Macías Mario E, Riojas-Garza Alberto
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the evaluation of ampullary tumors compared to histopathology (HP) staging.
METHODS: A retrospective diagnostic test study. Patients with ampullary tumors staged by EUS and postpancreatoduodenectomy HP attended during 2012-2018 at tertiary level hospital.
RESULTS: 14 patients with adenocarcinoma where included. Tumor size measured by EUS showed an adequate correlation (R = 0.65; p= 0.01) with HP. The accuracy in the evaluation of duodenal wall, pancreatic, and biliary duct invasion was 78.5, 78.5 and 57.1%, respectively. By HP, there were three T1 (21.4%), two T2 (14.2%) and nine T3 (64.2%). The accuracy of T and N staging by EUS was 71.4% (kappa = 0.50) and 50% (kappa = -0.04) respectively. There were more staging errors in patients with biliary stent.
CONCLUSION: EUS was useful in estimating tumor size, duodenal wall and pancreatic invasion. Limitation was found in the evaluation of biliary duct invasion, as well as overestimation of T stage and underestimation of N stage. It is necessary an increased effort in ultrasonography training. We suggest EUS testing before biliary stenting.
METHODS: A retrospective diagnostic test study. Patients with ampullary tumors staged by EUS and postpancreatoduodenectomy HP attended during 2012-2018 at tertiary level hospital.
RESULTS: 14 patients with adenocarcinoma where included. Tumor size measured by EUS showed an adequate correlation (R = 0.65; p= 0.01) with HP. The accuracy in the evaluation of duodenal wall, pancreatic, and biliary duct invasion was 78.5, 78.5 and 57.1%, respectively. By HP, there were three T1 (21.4%), two T2 (14.2%) and nine T3 (64.2%). The accuracy of T and N staging by EUS was 71.4% (kappa = 0.50) and 50% (kappa = -0.04) respectively. There were more staging errors in patients with biliary stent.
CONCLUSION: EUS was useful in estimating tumor size, duodenal wall and pancreatic invasion. Limitation was found in the evaluation of biliary duct invasion, as well as overestimation of T stage and underestimation of N stage. It is necessary an increased effort in ultrasonography training. We suggest EUS testing before biliary stenting.