BMJ open · 2026
Comparison of the identification and practicability of non-invasive diagnostic indicators under NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD in China: a cross-sectional study.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tan Xin-Yun, Zou Hui-Hui, Huang Xinjuan, Guo Man-Jie, Yu Ruo-Ling, Liu Xue-Lian, Peng Ting, Yang Xuan, Qin Chun-Xiang
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Early screening of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is critical for early diagnosis and management. The disease was renamed and its diagnostic criteria revised as metabolic-associated FLD (MAFLD) in 2020 and further updated to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in 2023. This study evaluated the predictive performance and clinical feasibility of non-invasive diagnostic indicators across the NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD diagnostic criteria.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Health Management Centre in China.
PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5810 participants aged ≥18 years were enrolled. Individuals with missing laboratory data, imaging results or self-reported information were excluded.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Disease-specific indicators included Fatty Liver Index (FLI), Hepatic Steatosis Index and Zhejiang University index (ZJU). Non-disease-specific indicators included lipid accumulation product (LAP), Visceral Adiposity Index and the Triglyceride and Glucose Index. Subgroup analysis was performed by gender and Body Mass Index (BMI).
RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for all six non-invasive indicators exceeded 0.7. FLI showed the optimal predictive performance across the three criteria (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.802, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.847 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.811), with comparable performance observed for ZJU (0.797, 0.838 and 0.809, respectively). Pairwise z-tests demonstrated a significant difference between FLI and ZJU for MAFLD (p<0.05), but not for NAFLD or MASLD (all p>0.05). Subgroup analyses revealed that ZJU performed better in males (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.790, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.839 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.803), while FLI was superior in females (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.832, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.838 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.838) and in participants who were overweight (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.709, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.765 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.709). LAP exhibited the highest predictive efficacy in the normal BMI subgroup (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.758, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.804 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.796).
CONCLUSIONS: FLI exhibited the highest predictive efficacy across all diagnostic criteria, and ZJU showed comparable performance. Considering diagnostic accuracy and clinical practicality, ZJU is recommended as a favourable, non-invasive tool for population-based screening in the Chinese population.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Health Management Centre in China.
PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5810 participants aged ≥18 years were enrolled. Individuals with missing laboratory data, imaging results or self-reported information were excluded.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Disease-specific indicators included Fatty Liver Index (FLI), Hepatic Steatosis Index and Zhejiang University index (ZJU). Non-disease-specific indicators included lipid accumulation product (LAP), Visceral Adiposity Index and the Triglyceride and Glucose Index. Subgroup analysis was performed by gender and Body Mass Index (BMI).
RESULTS: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for all six non-invasive indicators exceeded 0.7. FLI showed the optimal predictive performance across the three criteria (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.802, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.847 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.811), with comparable performance observed for ZJU (0.797, 0.838 and 0.809, respectively). Pairwise z-tests demonstrated a significant difference between FLI and ZJU for MAFLD (p<0.05), but not for NAFLD or MASLD (all p>0.05). Subgroup analyses revealed that ZJU performed better in males (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.790, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.839 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.803), while FLI was superior in females (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.832, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.838 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.838) and in participants who were overweight (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.709, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.765 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.709). LAP exhibited the highest predictive efficacy in the normal BMI subgroup (NAFLD-AUROC: 0.758, MAFLD-AUROC: 0.804 and MASLD-AUROC: 0.796).
CONCLUSIONS: FLI exhibited the highest predictive efficacy across all diagnostic criteria, and ZJU showed comparable performance. Considering diagnostic accuracy and clinical practicality, ZJU is recommended as a favourable, non-invasive tool for population-based screening in the Chinese population.