Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960) · 2005
A modified method for measuring uniocular fields of fixation: reliability in healthy subjects and in patients with Graves orbitopathy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Haggerty Helen, Richardson Sarah, Mitchell Keith W, Dickinson A Jane
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of recording uniocular fields of fixation using a modified perimeter technique in healthy subjects and patients with Graves orbitopathy (GO). Patients with restrictive myopathies, particularly GO, require accurate measurement of monocular excursions. These ductions are recorded in 4 to 12 directions of gaze using a perimeter, producing a plot known as a uniocular field of fixation. While 4 direction plots give limited information on vertical muscles, recording 12 directions is time consuming and uncomfortable. This modified technique uses the 6 directions of gaze corresponding to the primary field of action of each muscle.
METHODS: A single observer measured modified uniocular fields of fixation in 35 healthy subjects aged 20 to 60 years to establish normal and age-related ranges for all ductions. Fifteen subjects underwent measurement on 5 separate occasions by the same observer to establish intraobserver reproducibility. A second observer independently performed measurements in 10 of the subjects to determine interobserver reproducibility. Reliability was compared with that measured in 29 patients with GO.
RESULTS: The technique was reproducible to within 4 degrees for healthy subjects undergoing assessment by a single observer. When results of 2 observers were compared, the coefficient of repeatability was 7.9 degrees . For subjects with GO, however, maximal variability was 7.8 degrees . For clinical purposes, only a change of 8 degrees or more can be assumed to be significant.
CONCLUSIONS: This technique offers advantages for assessing any restrictive myopathy, including GO to within 8 degrees . This level of accuracy is likely to be similar in other centers, and has implications for interpreting GO outcome measures, where 5 degrees was previously taken to represent significant change.
METHODS: A single observer measured modified uniocular fields of fixation in 35 healthy subjects aged 20 to 60 years to establish normal and age-related ranges for all ductions. Fifteen subjects underwent measurement on 5 separate occasions by the same observer to establish intraobserver reproducibility. A second observer independently performed measurements in 10 of the subjects to determine interobserver reproducibility. Reliability was compared with that measured in 29 patients with GO.
RESULTS: The technique was reproducible to within 4 degrees for healthy subjects undergoing assessment by a single observer. When results of 2 observers were compared, the coefficient of repeatability was 7.9 degrees . For subjects with GO, however, maximal variability was 7.8 degrees . For clinical purposes, only a change of 8 degrees or more can be assumed to be significant.
CONCLUSIONS: This technique offers advantages for assessing any restrictive myopathy, including GO to within 8 degrees . This level of accuracy is likely to be similar in other centers, and has implications for interpreting GO outcome measures, where 5 degrees was previously taken to represent significant change.