Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques · 2024
Effect of Plastic Stents Following Lumen-Apposing Metal Stent Placement on Recurrence of Pancreatic Fluid Collections in Disconnected Pancreatic Duct Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Систематический обзорСтатьяМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liu Jiawen, Wei Zhengjie, Huang Qing, Yang Shizhong, Fang Yanbin, Ren Yutang, Jiang Xuan, Jiang Bo
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are preferred to initial drainage in pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) patients with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS) in recent years. However, unlike plastic stents, the long-term placement of LAMS is not recommended due to a high risk of local complications. This meta-analysis attempted to evaluate the effect of using plastic stents for prolonged drainage after LAMS removal on recurrence of PFCs in DPDS.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from inception until January 2023, to identify articles investigating the endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided treatment of plastic stents compared with no plastic stents following LAMS removal in patients with PFCs and DPDS. The primary outcome measures included recurrence of PFCs and need for reintervention.
RESULTS: We identified 3 eligible articles including 520 patients with PFCs, 246 of whom with DPDS. There was a total of 143 and 103 patients in the plastic stents group and in the no plastic stents group, respectively. The plastic stents group exhibited a lower rate of PFCs recurrence following LAMS removal after PFCs resolution compared with the no plastic stents group (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03-0.75; P =0.02). However, there was no difference in the rates of reintervention between the two groups (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.15-1.83; P =0.31). There was no severe adverse events and mortality associated with stent placement or exchange in all patients.
CONCLUSION: Deployment of plastic stents for long-term drainage after LAMS replacement can decrease the risk of PFCs recurrence in patients with DPDS following resolution, but it does not impact reintervention rates.
METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from inception until January 2023, to identify articles investigating the endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided treatment of plastic stents compared with no plastic stents following LAMS removal in patients with PFCs and DPDS. The primary outcome measures included recurrence of PFCs and need for reintervention.
RESULTS: We identified 3 eligible articles including 520 patients with PFCs, 246 of whom with DPDS. There was a total of 143 and 103 patients in the plastic stents group and in the no plastic stents group, respectively. The plastic stents group exhibited a lower rate of PFCs recurrence following LAMS removal after PFCs resolution compared with the no plastic stents group (OR 0.15; 95% CI 0.03-0.75; P =0.02). However, there was no difference in the rates of reintervention between the two groups (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.15-1.83; P =0.31). There was no severe adverse events and mortality associated with stent placement or exchange in all patients.
CONCLUSION: Deployment of plastic stents for long-term drainage after LAMS replacement can decrease the risk of PFCs recurrence in patients with DPDS following resolution, but it does not impact reintervention rates.