The Annals of thoracic surgery · 2020
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With J-Valve: 2-Year Outcomes From a Multicenter Study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shi Jun, Wei Lai, Chen Yucheng, Wang Xu, Ye Jian, Qin Chaoyi, Liu Lulu, Qian Hong, Wang Chunsheng, Guo Yingqiang
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: We report the 2-year follow-up outcomes of the J-Valve in the treatment of either aortic stenosis (AS) or pure aortic insufficiency (AI) from a multicenter study.
METHODS: From March 2014 to October 2016, 107 patients with either AS (n = 63) or pure AI (n = 44) were enrolled in a trial and were treated by transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the J-Valve system. All patients except 1 completed a 2-year clinical and echocardiographic follow-up (follow-up rate of 99%). The procedural and clinical outcomes were presented according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria.
RESULTS: The success rate of the device was 91.5%. All-cause mortality was 4.7% and 10.3% at 30 days and 2 years, respectively. Echocardiographic follow-up showed mild prosthetic valve regurgitation in 1.0% and 6.8% of patients at 30 days and 2 years, respectively. No patient showed more than mild aortic prosthetic regurgitation. At the 2-year follow-up, 97.6% of patients had mild or less than mild paravalvular leak and 99.8% of patients experienced notable improvement in heart failure symptoms (at least 1 NYHA level reduction). We found no major differences in echocardiographic and clinical follow-up between AS and AI, except for a significantly higher transvalvular gradient in the AS cohort (P = .01).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated good midterm outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the J-Valve system in the treatment of patients with either AS or AI. It suggests that the J-Valve system is a promising alternative therapy in high-risk patients.
METHODS: From March 2014 to October 2016, 107 patients with either AS (n = 63) or pure AI (n = 44) were enrolled in a trial and were treated by transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the J-Valve system. All patients except 1 completed a 2-year clinical and echocardiographic follow-up (follow-up rate of 99%). The procedural and clinical outcomes were presented according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria.
RESULTS: The success rate of the device was 91.5%. All-cause mortality was 4.7% and 10.3% at 30 days and 2 years, respectively. Echocardiographic follow-up showed mild prosthetic valve regurgitation in 1.0% and 6.8% of patients at 30 days and 2 years, respectively. No patient showed more than mild aortic prosthetic regurgitation. At the 2-year follow-up, 97.6% of patients had mild or less than mild paravalvular leak and 99.8% of patients experienced notable improvement in heart failure symptoms (at least 1 NYHA level reduction). We found no major differences in echocardiographic and clinical follow-up between AS and AI, except for a significantly higher transvalvular gradient in the AS cohort (P = .01).
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated good midterm outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the J-Valve system in the treatment of patients with either AS or AI. It suggests that the J-Valve system is a promising alternative therapy in high-risk patients.