Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2020
Reshaping bicuspid aortic valve stenosis with an hourglass-shaped balloon for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A pilot study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhao Zhen-Gang, Feng Yuan, Liao Yan-Biao, Li Yi-Jian, Xiong Tian-Yuan, Ou Yuan-Weixiang, Wang Zi-Jie, Wei Jia-Fu, Peng Yong, Wei Xin, Xu Yuan-Ning, Pedersen Wesley R, Chen Mao, Leon Martin B
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the safety and usefulness of preparatory anatomical reshaping with a geometric hourglass-shaped balloon to optimize transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) outcomes in bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis.
BACKGROUND: TAVR has been increasingly performed for BAV stenosis; however, technical challenges remain. Procedural results are suboptimal given unfavorable valvular anatomies.
METHODS: Eligible patients with BAV stenosis were enrolled to undergo aortic valve predilatation with the hourglass-shaped TAV8 balloon before TAVR using the self-expandable Venus A-Valve. Procedural details and outcomes were compared to a sequential group of patients with BAV who underwent TAVR with the same device following preparatory dilatation using a cylindrical balloon.
RESULTS: A total of 22 patients were enrolled in the TAV8 group and 53 were included in the control group. Valve downsizing was less common in the TAV8 group (36.4 vs. 67.9%; p = .012). Stable valve release and optimal implant depth were consistently achieved in the TAV8 group with no requirement for a second valve (0 vs. 17.0%; p = .039) and with higher device success rates (100.0 vs 77.4%; p = .014). Residual aortic regurgitation graded as ≥mild was less common in the TAV8 group (13.6 vs 45.3%; p = .009). Mortality was similar (0 vs. 3.8%; p = 1); no major/disabling stroke or conversion to open-heart surgery was seen in either group within 30 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with standard cylindrical balloon valvuloplasty, preparatory reshaping with the hourglass-shaped balloon before self-expandable TAVR in BAV was associated with significantly better procedural results and may encourage more promising outcomes.
BACKGROUND: TAVR has been increasingly performed for BAV stenosis; however, technical challenges remain. Procedural results are suboptimal given unfavorable valvular anatomies.
METHODS: Eligible patients with BAV stenosis were enrolled to undergo aortic valve predilatation with the hourglass-shaped TAV8 balloon before TAVR using the self-expandable Venus A-Valve. Procedural details and outcomes were compared to a sequential group of patients with BAV who underwent TAVR with the same device following preparatory dilatation using a cylindrical balloon.
RESULTS: A total of 22 patients were enrolled in the TAV8 group and 53 were included in the control group. Valve downsizing was less common in the TAV8 group (36.4 vs. 67.9%; p = .012). Stable valve release and optimal implant depth were consistently achieved in the TAV8 group with no requirement for a second valve (0 vs. 17.0%; p = .039) and with higher device success rates (100.0 vs 77.4%; p = .014). Residual aortic regurgitation graded as ≥mild was less common in the TAV8 group (13.6 vs 45.3%; p = .009). Mortality was similar (0 vs. 3.8%; p = 1); no major/disabling stroke or conversion to open-heart surgery was seen in either group within 30 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with standard cylindrical balloon valvuloplasty, preparatory reshaping with the hourglass-shaped balloon before self-expandable TAVR in BAV was associated with significantly better procedural results and may encourage more promising outcomes.