Journal of infection in developing countries · 2015
Investigation of clonal relationships of K. pneumoniae isolates from neonatal intensive care units by PFGE and rep-PCR.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koroglu Mehmet, Ozbek Ahmet, Demiray Tayfur, Hafizoglu Taner, Guclu Ertugrul, Altindis Mustafa, Karabay Oguz, Durmaz Riza
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Clonal relationships of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains obtained during an epidemic and after a one-year post-epidemic (non-epidemic) period in the same neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and repetitive polymerase chain reaction (rep-PCR) by the DiversiLab (DL) system were investigated, and the results of both molecular techniques were evaluated.
METHODOLOGY: Fifteen K. pneumoniae strains were included in this study. All identified bacterial strains were confirmed by 16S rDNA sequencing and analyzed by PFGE and the DL system.
RESULTS: According to the PFGE results, 15 isolates showed 10 different band profiles. Nine of these 15 isolates were included in one of the formed clusters, and the remaining six isolates were not included in any of them. According to the DL system results, 15 isolates showed two different clusters, with three strains in one cluster and four strains in the other. The remaining strains could not be placed any one of the clusters. PFGE was used as the gold standard based on its strong genetic discriminatory power. The DL system results showed that PFGE missed the relationship of the two epidemic-related strains and demonstrated one epidemic-unrelated strain to be epidemic related.
CONCLUSIONS: Both systems may easily be used for clonal relationships of K. pneumoniae strains. The DL system was clearly more rapid and convenient than PFGE, but its discriminatory power seemed to be inferior to that of PFGE based on 15 K. pneumoniae strains.
METHODOLOGY: Fifteen K. pneumoniae strains were included in this study. All identified bacterial strains were confirmed by 16S rDNA sequencing and analyzed by PFGE and the DL system.
RESULTS: According to the PFGE results, 15 isolates showed 10 different band profiles. Nine of these 15 isolates were included in one of the formed clusters, and the remaining six isolates were not included in any of them. According to the DL system results, 15 isolates showed two different clusters, with three strains in one cluster and four strains in the other. The remaining strains could not be placed any one of the clusters. PFGE was used as the gold standard based on its strong genetic discriminatory power. The DL system results showed that PFGE missed the relationship of the two epidemic-related strains and demonstrated one epidemic-unrelated strain to be epidemic related.
CONCLUSIONS: Both systems may easily be used for clonal relationships of K. pneumoniae strains. The DL system was clearly more rapid and convenient than PFGE, but its discriminatory power seemed to be inferior to that of PFGE based on 15 K. pneumoniae strains.