Heart rhythm · 2014
Myotonic dystrophy type 1 mimics and exacerbates Brugada phenotype induced by Nav1.5 sodium channel loss-of-function mutation.
Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pambrun Thomas, Mercier Aurélie, Chatelier Aurélien, Patri Sylvie, Schott Jean-Jacques, Le Scouarnec Solena, Chahine Mohamed, Degand Bruno, Bois Patrick
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1), a muscular dystrophy due to CTG expansion in the DMPK gene, can cause cardiac conduction disorders and sudden death. These cardiac manifestations are similar to those observed in loss-of-function SCN5A mutations, which are also responsible for Brugada syndrome (BrS).
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate DM1 effects on clinical expression of a loss-of-function SCN5A mutation causing BrS.
METHODS: We performed complete clinical evaluation, including ajmaline test, in 1 family combining DM1 and BrS. We screened the known BrS susceptibility genes. We characterized an SCN5A mutation using whole-cell patch-clamp experiments associated with cell surface biotinylation.
RESULTS: The proband, a 15-year-old female, was a survivor of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ventricular fibrillation. She combined a DMPK CTG expansion from the father's side and an SCN5A mutation (S910L) from the mother's side. S910L is a trafficking defective mutant inducing a dominant negative effect when transfected with wild-type Nav1.5. This loss-of-function SCN5A mutation caused a Brugada phenotype during the mother's ajmaline test. Surprisingly, in the father, a DM1 patient without SCN5A mutation, ajmaline also unmasked a Brugada phenotype. Furthermore, association of both genetic abnormalities in the proband exacerbated the response to ajmaline with a massive conduction defect.
CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to describe the deleterious effect of DM1 on clinical expression of a loss-of-function SCN5A mutation and to show a provoked BrS phenotype in a DM1 patient. The modification of the ECG pattern by ajmaline supports the hypothesis of a link between DM1 and Nav1.5 loss of -function.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate DM1 effects on clinical expression of a loss-of-function SCN5A mutation causing BrS.
METHODS: We performed complete clinical evaluation, including ajmaline test, in 1 family combining DM1 and BrS. We screened the known BrS susceptibility genes. We characterized an SCN5A mutation using whole-cell patch-clamp experiments associated with cell surface biotinylation.
RESULTS: The proband, a 15-year-old female, was a survivor of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with ventricular fibrillation. She combined a DMPK CTG expansion from the father's side and an SCN5A mutation (S910L) from the mother's side. S910L is a trafficking defective mutant inducing a dominant negative effect when transfected with wild-type Nav1.5. This loss-of-function SCN5A mutation caused a Brugada phenotype during the mother's ajmaline test. Surprisingly, in the father, a DM1 patient without SCN5A mutation, ajmaline also unmasked a Brugada phenotype. Furthermore, association of both genetic abnormalities in the proband exacerbated the response to ajmaline with a massive conduction defect.
CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to describe the deleterious effect of DM1 on clinical expression of a loss-of-function SCN5A mutation and to show a provoked BrS phenotype in a DM1 patient. The modification of the ECG pattern by ajmaline supports the hypothesis of a link between DM1 and Nav1.5 loss of -function.