Archives of cardiovascular diseases · 2013
Dual phenotypic transmission in Brugada syndrome.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hermida Jean-Sylvain, Arnalsteen-Dassonvalle Elise, Kubala Maciej, Mathiron Amel, Traulle Sarah, Anbazhagan Kolandaswamy, Hermida Alexis, Rochette Jacques
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Brugada syndrome is a genetic heart disease with autosomal dominant inheritance. Family screening commonly detects one parent responsible for transmission of the disease.
AIMS: To describe atypical transmission of Brugada syndrome.
METHODS: Between 2001 and 2007, systematic screening, including an electrocardiogram, ajmaline challenge and DNA sequencing of the SCN5A gene, of the first-degree relatives of 62 probands with Brugada syndrome was performed (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique).
RESULTS: In two families, both parents transmitted Brugada syndrome to their offspring. In the first family, the proband presented Brugada electrocardiogram features with ajmaline challenge and carried a new SCN5A mutation (p.V1281F). The mutation was also identified in the mother, who had a type 1 aspect on inferior leads with ajmaline. The proband's father presented a typical Brugada electrocardiogram pattern on lead V2 with ajmaline and no SCN5A gene mutation. In the second family, the proband was a boy aged 2.5 years who had been resuscitated from sudden cardiac death. Ajmaline challenge revealed a typical Brugada electrocardiogram pattern in both parents but with no mutation in the genes studied.
CONCLUSION: Family studies should always be exhaustive and discovery of one parent with Brugada syndrome does not eliminate the need for screening of the other parent.
AIMS: To describe atypical transmission of Brugada syndrome.
METHODS: Between 2001 and 2007, systematic screening, including an electrocardiogram, ajmaline challenge and DNA sequencing of the SCN5A gene, of the first-degree relatives of 62 probands with Brugada syndrome was performed (Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique).
RESULTS: In two families, both parents transmitted Brugada syndrome to their offspring. In the first family, the proband presented Brugada electrocardiogram features with ajmaline challenge and carried a new SCN5A mutation (p.V1281F). The mutation was also identified in the mother, who had a type 1 aspect on inferior leads with ajmaline. The proband's father presented a typical Brugada electrocardiogram pattern on lead V2 with ajmaline and no SCN5A gene mutation. In the second family, the proband was a boy aged 2.5 years who had been resuscitated from sudden cardiac death. Ajmaline challenge revealed a typical Brugada electrocardiogram pattern in both parents but with no mutation in the genes studied.
CONCLUSION: Family studies should always be exhaustive and discovery of one parent with Brugada syndrome does not eliminate the need for screening of the other parent.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAjmalineAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsBrugada SyndromeChild, PreschoolDNA Mutational AnalysisDeath, Sudden, CardiacElectrocardiographyElectrophysiologic Techniques, CardiacFemaleGenetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHeredityHeterozygoteHumansMaleMutationNAV1.5 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelPedigreePhenotypePredictive Value of TestsResuscitationYoung Adult